5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

MAC OR FLOW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2005, 06:25 PM
  #11  
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
vfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 11,394
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

[quote]ORIGINAL: stanglx2002


ORIGINAL: 1991_5.0_Convertible

Those MAC dumps don't take away too much backpressure do they? I've got a straight piped (2.25 inch) cat back right now and I need my back pressure back. I'm seriously looking into them to finish up my exhaust.
you wont need back pressure as soon as you do your gears

^^^^^^^^
funny post
vfast is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:26 AM
  #12  
crazyhorse
3rd Gear Member
 
crazyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 854
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

i like mac. just right for me & i think i have heard them all, but different stroke for different folk.
crazyhorse is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 06:43 AM
  #13  
92hatchLX
6th Gear Member
 
92hatchLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,439
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

Well I know that the straight pipes definentally help in the high rpms, but it acts like it's got a turbo on it lol, it don't really get up and go till about 2500 rpms. So I think that I might do those MAC dumps; they're cheap, I've got MAC headers and o/r h-pipe so it'll probably fit better than other brands, and it'll still be (somewhat) loud. Just one more question, when you are sitting there idling, you don't have any problems with exhaust fumes coming into your car do you, from underneath?
92hatchLX is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 07:43 AM
  #14  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

tailpipes will help with the back pressure and it will sound a lot better, not just loud
primetime5.0 is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 08:34 AM
  #15  
ironside82
 
ironside82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 16
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

This is some good reading.
ironside82 is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 01:54 PM
  #16  
HC_CrAzYHoRsE
Super Moderator
 
HC_CrAzYHoRsE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW


ORIGINAL: mustang30240

tailpipes will help with the back pressure and it will sound a lot better, not just loud
+ it looks a whole lot better
HC_CrAzYHoRsE is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:02 PM
  #17  
StangTangGT
3rd Gear Member
 
StangTangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cocoa beach, FL
Posts: 853
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

Ok well I've had flows before too, and they do not sound the same. The mac is a little deeper, and i gained more power when i switched to mac. and ive had flowmasters dumped, and when i put the tailpipes on, i lost power from too much backpressure. But either way go with a 2.5" setup.
StangTangGT is offline  
Old 12-11-2005, 04:09 PM
  #18  
Vash the Stampede
3rd Gear Member
 
Vash the Stampede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 524
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

is sound a factor? i always heard Mac was better performance, but flowmasters was more for sound.. i personaly have flowmasters on my car. and i love it.
Vash the Stampede is offline  
Old 12-26-2005, 01:48 PM
  #19  
LS1mustang
1st Gear Member
 
LS1mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 101
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

flowmaster for sound
mac for sound and performance


tail pipes are for show cars.
LS1mustang is offline  
Old 12-28-2005, 12:20 AM
  #20  
Dubs
2nd Gear Member
 
Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 394
Default RE: MAC OR FLOW

I have flowmasters on my 5.0 now, can I still use those if I decide to go with MAC cat back system? Also, do you guys recommend leaving the cat converter on the car with thise set up?
Dubs is offline  


Quick Reply: MAC OR FLOW



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.