MAC OR FLOW
#1
MAC OR FLOW
My buddywanted me to ask you guys this question he just purchased a stock 89 gt but is having problems with what exhaust he wants he is chosing between flowmaster american thunder cat backs with a mac prochamber o/r H or Mac catbacks with a mac prochamber o/r H..He is loooking for deep and very loud what would make his happy flowmaster or Mac?
#3
RE: MAC OR FLOW
Man I have the mac pro dumps, and let me tell you, best exhaust investment ive ever made! Sound sooooo bad ***, not to mention are $200 for the whole catback and have a black powdercoat finish. These things scream! Wish i had an exhaust clip for ya. And i have an 89 gt with BBK equal length headers and an off road h pipe.
#6
RE: MAC OR FLOW
Those MAC dumps don't take away too much backpressure do they? I've got a straight piped (2.25 inch) cat back right now and I need my back pressure back. I'm seriously looking into them to finish up my exhaust.
#8
RE: MAC OR FLOW
ORIGINAL: 1991_5.0_Convertible
Those MAC dumps don't take away too much backpressure do they? I've got a straight piped (2.25 inch) cat back right now and I need my back pressure back. I'm seriously looking into them to finish up my exhaust.
Those MAC dumps don't take away too much backpressure do they? I've got a straight piped (2.25 inch) cat back right now and I need my back pressure back. I'm seriously looking into them to finish up my exhaust.
also i have heard the MAC are louder then the flows IMO i dont like flows thats why i went with dynomax ultra flows
#9
RE: MAC OR FLOW
ORIGINAL: 1991_5.0_Convertible
I've got a straight piped (2.25 inch) cat back right now and I need my back pressure back.
I've got a straight piped (2.25 inch) cat back right now and I need my back pressure back.
it was AMAZINGLY slow....and it had 4.10's .....stockish 5.0's need backpressure to run good.