5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Flows sucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2005, 04:47 PM
  #11  
Black Snake
5th Gear Member
 
Black Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,721
Default RE: Flows sucks

I had cherry bombs for a long time, my dad had them on when he gave me the car (hes old school). They sounded awsome, very clean and idled very nicely. I got many complemments on the glass packs because it sounded different from all the other stangs.
Black Snake is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:07 PM
  #12  
92hatchLX
6th Gear Member
 
92hatchLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,439
Default RE: Flows sucks

Horrible in the bottom end, but there is a gain from 2500 rpms and up. I'm gettin the MAC catback as soon as i get my next paycheck, I can get the entire cat back for 300 shipped, not a bad price.
92hatchLX is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 09:04 PM
  #13  
promustanperformance
2nd Gear Member
 
promustanperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 353
Default RE: Flows sucks

Sick of them as in sick of the noise? If that's so, switch to a set of Hooker Aerochambers. Dyno tests show they make more power, have a very deep sound, but dont' resonate like Flowmaster and MAC. Check them out: Aerochamber Mufflers @ ProMustangPerformance
promustanperformance is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 09:31 PM
  #14  
rsw007
4th Gear Member
 
rsw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: south carolina
Posts: 1,037
Default RE: Flows sucks

i have dynomax super turbos on my car. nice sound, not to mention there cheap and quiet.
rsw007 is offline  
Old 12-16-2005, 11:33 PM
  #15  
waxyourboard
3rd Gear Member
 
waxyourboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sarasota/Orlando, Florida
Posts: 614
Default RE: Flows sucks

i <3 my glass packs
waxyourboard is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 01:34 AM
  #16  
brutal_gt
3rd Gear Member
 
brutal_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 501
Default RE: Flows sucks


ORIGINAL: 93StangLX

Im sick of flowmasters on my stang,Would i notice any difference switching to mac catbacks or just leave the flows?
this makes no sense.
brutal_gt is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 01:44 AM
  #17  
Steeda1716
3rd Gear Member
 
Steeda1716's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NewYork
Posts: 970
Default RE: Flows sucks

If you say so..
Steeda1716 is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 01:53 AM
  #18  
brutal_gt
3rd Gear Member
 
brutal_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 501
Default RE: Flows sucks


ORIGINAL: Steeda1716

If you say so..
considering those 2 exhaust systems are almost exactly alike in performance and sound, he would need a reason other than he's sick of it. a reason wasnt given so to me, no it doesnt make any sense.

so yeah i do say so.
brutal_gt is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 02:53 AM
  #19  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: Flows sucks

there is just one thing the flows give the mustang an unmistakable sound they might make a few less horse power but its the muscle-car mufflers to have!
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 12-17-2005, 10:42 AM
  #20  
rsw007
4th Gear Member
 
rsw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: south carolina
Posts: 1,037
Default RE: Flows sucks


ORIGINAL: rmodel65

there is just one thing the flows give the mustang an unmistakable sound they might make a few less horse power but its the muscle-car mufflers to have!
thats why i didnt use them. 8 out 10 stangs on the road sound the same.
rsw007 is offline  


Quick Reply: Flows sucks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.