Tail lights: 94-95 vs. 96-98
10-11-2007, 08:49 AM
#5
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 2,632
RE: Tail lights: 94-95 vs. 96-98
ORIGINAL: ctgreddy
i like the 96-98 tails myself.
to me they look more mustangy with the vertical taillights.
then u can get those sequential turn signals too
i like the 96-98 tails myself.
to me they look more mustangy with the vertical taillights.
then u can get those sequential turn signals too
10-11-2007, 09:06 AM
#6
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,171
RE: Tail lights: 94-95 vs. 96-98
if i had an sn95 id take the 94-95 lights too
VERY nice especially on a white one. i think the 96-98 lights are hideous, the body was not designed for those lights so they dont flow right with the car.
new edge vertical tail lights on the other hand, those are nice
VERY nice especially on a white one. i think the 96-98 lights are hideous, the body was not designed for those lights so they dont flow right with the car.
new edge vertical tail lights on the other hand, those are nice
10-11-2007, 10:44 AM
#8
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
RE: Tail lights: 94-95 vs. 96-98
I have to agree on the 96-98 tail lights. The sausage fest lights just look cheap, and sequentials with the horizontal ones would just look stupid. Love my tail lights with the chaser turn signals. +1 on Mustangs having verticals.
10-11-2007, 11:01 AM
#9
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 317
RE: Tail lights: 94-95 vs. 96-98
I don't think I would pay to change from one to the other either way. Then again, I'm cheap on appearance mods. Just the fact that I wanted a five oh so I could save some trouble on the 351 swap.
I didn't like the 94-95 lights when I bought it. I was gonna swap for some 96-98's, but they grew on me. [&:]
I didn't like the 94-95 lights when I bought it. I was gonna swap for some 96-98's, but they grew on me. [&:]
