Question for the Superchargers
#11
RE: Question for the Superchargers
ORIGINAL: 90_Mustang_GT
I just installed the new paxton sl. No oil line to the pan, self contained oil in the unit. Got through summit for 2300$ and put in on there credit card and i pay 76 bucks a month for it. Took me a lil bit longer than expected to install had to make up sum custom brackets since i have no a/c and crap, but worth it.
I just installed the new paxton sl. No oil line to the pan, self contained oil in the unit. Got through summit for 2300$ and put in on there credit card and i pay 76 bucks a month for it. Took me a lil bit longer than expected to install had to make up sum custom brackets since i have no a/c and crap, but worth it.
#12
RE: Question for the Superchargers
I had an ATI a few years ago on my 93, took some time to install andmade good power. It think it made a lot of under hood heat (compared to a buddy with a Vortech)
If I had to do it again I would go with a Turbo kit, stock 5.0 are making close to 500 !!
More power less $$$
http://www.bgturbokits.com/store/
http://www.quicktimeturbosystems.com/info.html
#13
RE: Question for the Superchargers
ORIGINAL: ak47dennis
I had an ATI a few years ago on my 93, took some time to install andmade good power. It think it made a lot of under hood heat (compared to a buddy with a Vortech)
If I had to do it again I would go with a Turbo kit, stock 5.0 are making close to 500 !!
More power less $$$
http://www.bgturbokits.com/store/
http://www.quicktimeturbosystems.com/info.html
I had an ATI a few years ago on my 93, took some time to install andmade good power. It think it made a lot of under hood heat (compared to a buddy with a Vortech)
If I had to do it again I would go with a Turbo kit, stock 5.0 are making close to 500 !!
More power less $$$
http://www.bgturbokits.com/store/
http://www.quicktimeturbosystems.com/info.html
#15
RE: Question for the Superchargers
ORIGINAL: bbbngowc
Yeah but turbos are more difficult to install and are a bytch to maintain.
ORIGINAL: ak47dennis
I had an ATI a few years ago on my 93, took some time to install andmade good power. It think it made a lot of under hood heat (compared to a buddy with a Vortech)
If I had to do it again I would go with a Turbo kit, stock 5.0 are making close to 500 !!
More power less $$$
http://www.bgturbokits.com/store/
http://www.quicktimeturbosystems.com/info.html
I had an ATI a few years ago on my 93, took some time to install andmade good power. It think it made a lot of under hood heat (compared to a buddy with a Vortech)
If I had to do it again I would go with a Turbo kit, stock 5.0 are making close to 500 !!
More power less $$$
http://www.bgturbokits.com/store/
http://www.quicktimeturbosystems.com/info.html
#16
RE: Question for the Superchargers
ORIGINAL: Mustangkiler
Igot a kb on 6 psi 2.2 on 94 5.0 only other mods were a k and n intake, h pipe, flows, 70mm tb and stock gt40 lower intake. It made barely over 50 hp, but a ton of torque as said, but that large of a supercharger really needs to be run higher psi to see its potential, it came alive alot more when i cranked it up to 10 psi. I plan on running same amount now after i installed steeda 19 with 1.7's gt40x heads and summit shorties, hoping it runs pretty strong after its all dynotuned out.
Igot a kb on 6 psi 2.2 on 94 5.0 only other mods were a k and n intake, h pipe, flows, 70mm tb and stock gt40 lower intake. It made barely over 50 hp, but a ton of torque as said, but that large of a supercharger really needs to be run higher psi to see its potential, it came alive alot more when i cranked it up to 10 psi. I plan on running same amount now after i installed steeda 19 with 1.7's gt40x heads and summit shorties, hoping it runs pretty strong after its all dynotuned out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM