sn-95 all the way. i think foxes aren't aggressive looking enough

 

SN-95. They look good, have nice interiors, ABS and disk brakes, and rattle less. Plus they have the 5.0 power plant and can make some serious power too. Although I will say, I love the look of a clean, sleeper Fox.

 

SN95 or a clean LX notch.
SN got my vote due to better interior, 4 wheel disc, ABS, and i like the looks better.

but a clean notch with an SN95 interior...
its been done before...
food for thought.

 

I think theyre both nice, but Im partial to the fox, thats all Ive ever owned.

 

On my second 95

 

Notch to be exact!

 

not aggressive enough?

 

agreed.

however if i didnt own a notch i would skip straight to a sn95 car

 

*sigh* here goes...

while we're at it why don't we ask everyone which gear is best and which exhaust sounds the best?

If you want to know what people think just look at the cars they own.

uhhh have you seen a stock SN95??

 

For some reason I never noticed the fox mustangs ... for years they completely escaped my notice...
...
until I saw a notchback! Bitchin' super clean and yes foxes are euro compared to 1st gen mustangs, well I am backwards compared to many

I dont like the fox hatch backs at all, think the hatch lines, the body effects suck and the GT tail lights suck too!!

I have had 3 classic mustangs and like the fastback all the way but like the coupe foxes.

I have had 6 foxes - all notchbacks. Now I have my 67 fastback (1st car owned) and a 1991, 1992, 1993 notchback, for me thats the ticket!

ok so thats my bias. Another way to look at it is on a pratical stand point
-the fox is a bit easier to work on (space, abs, computer, etc)

-and lightness means quicker for same power and/or

-better mpg potentially