5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

For those that enjoy long tales, and enjoy sharing wisdom, c'mon in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2011, 05:36 PM
  #11  
Bobert
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 717
Default

Sorry adder, i have pretty good hook ups at a machine shop, so getting the 347 built wont be the problem. Its everything after the short block that's going to cost me. So if i did build a 351 id stroke it for that reason. But for right now id be very happy with the 347.

Yea kweb i agree about the computer. In the long run i would rather run a quater horse / tweeker then a 'calibrated' maff.
Bobert is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 05:43 PM
  #12  
kweb288
5th Gear Member
 
kweb288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Charles Il, and ISU
Posts: 3,736
Default

U will need a calibrated Maff no mater what
kweb288 is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 06:03 PM
  #13  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

363 FTW!!!!!!!
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 07:46 PM
  #14  
5.0kid
5th Gear Member
 
5.0kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The mitten
Posts: 2,525
Default

trust me a 351 sucks *** to swap im in the middle of it lol and my shiz is even more one off nascar crap try getting a part for that shiz lol
5.0kid is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 08:29 PM
  #15  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

Originally Posted by 5.0kid
trust me a 351 sucks *** to swap im in the middle of it lol and my shiz is even more one off nascar crap try getting a part for that shiz lol
hey just out of curiosity, what are the specs on your shortblock? (block, stroke, bore etc)

is your engine a 9.2 or 9.5" deck?

or am i wayyyyyyyy off? lol
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 10:50 PM
  #16  
Bobert
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 717
Default

408 ftw!!

but in all seriousness.

It looks like im just going to have to hold off, let my poor stock baby hold on for one more abusive summer. Then begin the 347?
Bobert is offline  
Old 02-21-2011, 11:06 PM
  #17  
Blown408
2nd Gear Member
 
Blown408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 210
Default

I actually would go the other way on this. I helped a friend from scratch on tearing his little 302 out and putting a 351 in. He did a lot of homework before hand. This is what I would push on it, because if he hadn't, it would of actually been hell!! I just like the possibilties of going as big as you want and the added side to it is you would be adding a stronger foundation rather then always worrying about the strength of the stock 302 block. I know you are probably saying to yourself right now, "Its not like I am looking for 800hp". But as we all know, once you start building a car, every year it gets slower and slower to you because you get used to it. Thats when Nitrous kits get bought and forced induction. I just like the 351 blocks, of course the older ones preferably, for that added strength. Just my two cents on it. It may be a hassle to do it, but I think if you way all the options you would take a long hard look at it!!
Blown408 is offline  
Old 02-22-2011, 12:05 AM
  #18  
Shelty
5th Gear Member
 
Shelty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bumblef***, MD
Posts: 4,842
Default

if your short on cash, honestly, id just pull the stock motor, give it a stock rebuild and throw it back in. you say your broke right now being in college, save your money, cuz youll need it later down the line if your like me and having trouble finding a job that pays when student loans come around to bite you in the butt...

plus you go building up your engine, your gonna need supporting mods and risk stuff breaking.

just my .02 cents
Shelty is offline  
Old 02-28-2011, 11:41 PM
  #19  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

If you use that 351W engine tha car will end up with about 75# more wieght on the front end.
FOX Mustangs had about 56-58% of the weight on the front ends from the factory so I think you are making something bad worse.
Stay with a 8.2 block.
No hood clearance problems either......
No hard to find headers either.........
tinman is offline  
Old 03-01-2011, 12:15 AM
  #20  
Bobert
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 717
Default

Originally Posted by tinman
If you use that 351W engine tha car will end up with about 75# more weight on the front end.
FOX Mustangs had about 56-58% of the weight on the front ends from the factory so I think you are making something bad worse.
Stay with a 8.2 block.
No hood clearance problems either......
No hard to find headers either.........
Thats something i didnt think of actually. Good point.
Bobert is offline  


Quick Reply: For those that enjoy long tales, and enjoy sharing wisdom, c'mon in



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.