5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2012, 12:07 PM
  #1  
javila2468
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
javila2468's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 189
Default cam?

I got offered this cam from summit racing, COMP Cams 35-420-8, they told me i could use it on my carb setup and stock e7 heads and will be able to clear PVC. i'm still planning on doing a PVC check. would this be a good choice over HO cam. these are the specs.

Cam Style Hydraulic roller tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range 1,800-5,000
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift 215
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift 215
Duration at 050 inch Lift 215 int./215 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration 270
Advertised Exhaust Duration 270
Advertised Duration 270 int./270 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.533 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.533 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.533 int./0.533 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees) 110
Computer-Controlled Compatible No
Grind Number FW 270H-R10
Valve Springs Required Yes
javila2468 is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 04:07 PM
  #2  
Duncan_GT
4th Gear Member
 
Duncan_GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,353
Default

That may work with your heads, but i suggest upgrading your springs.
Duncan_GT is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 09:48 PM
  #3  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Go a cheaper route like the stage 1 tfs cam! You dont need that much lift with a stock head and the durations are small plus it is a single pattern camshaft!

What are your current mods?

With the tfs stage 1 and the right springs you wont be over what you will pay alone for that camshaft you posted.

plus a 302 low c/r wont like a 110* lobe sep most likely..... you want no less than 112-116* lobe sep.

The stage 1 is 112 i believe, if you are bent on comp cams which i also use, something like this would be more suitable pending your other mods....CCA-35-349-8

There are many things needed to make a close to spot on selection, anyone can say this one or that one, for the most part the tfs stage 1 is an all around good camshaft for mostly stock applications!

Good luck with the choice!

just a small note lobe seperation determines a number of things mostly concerning dynamic compression and on low compression engines you want a wider lobe sep to retain as much of your static compression as possible. Having a lobe sep to close on a low compression engine will cause it to be a dog down in the low rpm ranges!
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 07:21 AM
  #4  
javila2468
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
javila2468's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Venomantidote95
Go a cheaper route like the stage 1 tfs cam! You dont need that much lift with a stock head and the durations are small plus it is a single pattern camshaft!

What are your current mods?

With the tfs stage 1 and the right springs you wont be over what you will pay alone for that camshaft you posted.

plus a 302 low c/r wont like a 110* lobe sep most likely..... you want no less than 112-116* lobe sep.

The stage 1 is 112 i believe, if you are bent on comp cams which i also use, something like this would be more suitable pending your other mods....CCA-35-349-8

There are many things needed to make a close to spot on selection, anyone can say this one or that one, for the most part the tfs stage 1 is an all around good camshaft for mostly stock applications!

Good luck with the choice!

just a small note lobe seperation determines a number of things mostly concerning dynamic compression and on low compression engines you want a wider lobe sep to retain as much of your static compression as possible. Having a lobe sep to close on a low compression engine will cause it to be a dog down in the low rpm ranges!
These are my current mods. Edelbrock Air Gap intake (ported) with Edelbrock manual choke 600 cfm carb, ported to max e7te heads, MAC unequal shorty headers, adjuster fp, 1.7 cran cam rockers, 3:73 rear-end, full H-pipe 2.5in flowmaster, stock 5 speed.

I don't know much or at all on cams. i'm trying to learn about cams but damn its alot of factors that come into play when choosing the right one for your application. i'll stick to anything comp cams or trick flow. i don't want any b303, e303, x303 or z303 or f cams.

my next upgrade by the end of the year would be tf twisted edge heads, adj 1.6 rockers, Holley 0-76750RD 750 CFM Ultra Double Pumper Four Barrel Street/Strip Carburetor and long tubes.

Last edited by javila2468; 09-06-2012 at 07:25 AM.
javila2468 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 08:33 PM
  #5  
Venomantidote95
4th Gear Member
 
Venomantidote95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812
Default

Unless a letter cam just falls into your hands free dont bother! If you are pending further upgrades then save for the heads and cam at the same time! you DO NOT need a 750 on a 302 no more than a 670 at the most unless you get into a higher compression ratio etc...

a 670 street avenger works well with a dual plane intake on a 302 with 9:1 c/r.....
Venomantidote95 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:35 PM
  #6  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

I don't think you have enough compression for that cam to work good.
If you do use that cam, find out from Comps what springs they want you to use if you are using a 1.7 rocker and what insta;;ed hieght they are supposed to be......
tinman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
10-05-2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM



Quick Reply: cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.