5.0L GT S550 Tech This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the GT variation of the 2015+ Ford Mustang.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any data on the 0-60 times of a automatic GT between 3.15s vs 3.55s Rear Axle Ratios?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 8, 2015 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
moman89's Avatar
moman89
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
From: Canada
Default Any data on the 0-60 times of a automatic GT between 3.15s vs 3.55s Rear Axle Ratios?

Hi,

I'm just curious to find out what sort of difference the rear axle ratio would have on 0-60 or 1/4 mile runs with GTs equipped with a 3.15s and 3.55s rear axle ratios? Is there some sort of formula that can be applied to figure this out or is there some data out there? I'm just curios of the effect of a RAR on times


thanks
Old May 8, 2015 | 06:58 PM
  #2  
1BAD3V's Avatar
1BAD3V
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,828
From: Clarksville TN
Default

I haven't seen any tests or data but you might see a .1-.3 increase in your 1/4 mile times. Probably not much in the 0 to 60 run.
Old May 9, 2015 | 06:11 PM
  #3  
moman89's Avatar
moman89
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
From: Canada
Default

For any intrested, I found this article... a 3.15 Auto vs a Performance package Stang.

To my shock, the auto was slightly quicker! I'm guessing the manual maybe didn't have the best driver out there but still... interesting

http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/...the-money.html
Old May 10, 2015 | 11:46 AM
  #4  
daytripper's Avatar
daytripper
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 64
From: E,TN
Default

Originally Posted by moman89
For any intrested, I found this article... a 3.15 Auto vs a Performance package Stang.

To my shock, the auto was slightly quicker! I'm guessing the manual maybe didn't have the best driver out there but still... interesting

http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/...the-money.html
Why the shock? Autos are always faster.If the test car would have been equipped with the 3.55 gears the difference would have been significantly more.
Old May 12, 2015 | 05:19 PM
  #5  
Tripleshot McC's Avatar
Tripleshot McC
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
From: CA
Default

I know that I had 3:15s in my 2012 and the 3:55s in this car make it a rocket! I almost don't need 1st unless I'm on a hill. I do find myself in 5th more often than I used to but man, cruising to light speed is a toe-tap away!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
May 3, 2018 10:38 PM
prophotog
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
10
Aug 26, 2015 11:55 AM
PearlGenPu
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
6
Aug 12, 2015 01:57 PM
ccwebb
GT S197 General Discussion
2
Aug 11, 2015 06:47 PM
Daleford
GT S197 General Discussion
0
Aug 10, 2015 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.