Turbo v.s. Supercharger
#2
RE: Turbo v.s. Supercharger
Well it all depends on what kind of performance you looking for do you want a track beast or fast a$$ street car, on the supercharger side if you go with lets say a kenny bell you'll be getting tons of low end so good for the quarter. If you go with a centrifugal ie. vortech,procharger,paxton you'll get more top end. As far as turbo's i personally don't know a whole lot other than turbo's are harder on your engine, and when you punch it with a supercharger you build boost and take off with a turbo you have to wait for it to spool up then boom your gone, but like i said it's all about what your looking for so hope this helps a little
#3
RE: Turbo v.s. Supercharger
Turbo
A turbo is not as hard on your engine as a supercharger and it does n't
cost (hp) being driven by the crank. I have a twin turbo BULLITT for
three years with the stock motor (451 rwhp).Turbo's cost more and you get more ..
A turbo is not as hard on your engine as a supercharger and it does n't
cost (hp) being driven by the crank. I have a twin turbo BULLITT for
three years with the stock motor (451 rwhp).Turbo's cost more and you get more ..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM