Bullitt Mustangs

Turbo v.s. Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2008, 02:29 AM
  #1  
ericbazoogas
Thread Starter
 
ericbazoogas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 24
Default Turbo v.s. Supercharger

So i'm thinkin about putting a blower on her... Let me here some ideas from you guys to help me make my decision. Which way should i go???
ericbazoogas is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 10:17 PM
  #2  
jbullitt2005
 
jbullitt2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aurora. MO
Posts: 44
Default RE: Turbo v.s. Supercharger

Well it all depends on what kind of performance you looking for do you want a track beast or fast a$$ street car, on the supercharger side if you go with lets say a kenny bell you'll be getting tons of low end so good for the quarter. If you go with a centrifugal ie. vortech,procharger,paxton you'll get more top end. As far as turbo's i personally don't know a whole lot other than turbo's are harder on your engine, and when you punch it with a supercharger you build boost and take off with a turbo you have to wait for it to spool up then boom your gone, but like i said it's all about what your looking for so hope this helps a little
jbullitt2005 is offline  
Old 02-02-2008, 08:06 AM
  #3  
Bullittbaby
 
Bullittbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
Default RE: Turbo v.s. Supercharger

Turbo
A turbo is not as hard on your engine as a supercharger and it does n't
cost (hp) being driven by the crank. I have a twin turbo BULLITT for
three years with the stock motor (451 rwhp).Turbo's cost more and you get more ..
Bullittbaby is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
TCStangerv6
Street/Strip
12
10-11-2015 05:57 PM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM



Quick Reply: Turbo v.s. Supercharger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.