Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

351W vs 302 vs 289

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2006, 04:21 PM
  #21  
myshifter
I ♥ Acer
 
myshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,364
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

ORIGINAL: rmodel65

www.ausfordparts.com


http://www.ausfordparts.com/block.html here the link to engine cores!

apparently u didnt put ur engine together right i was pulling my left front tire with my 351c 2v in my 72 fastabck with an open rear and 3:1 gears!! clevelands make power effortlessly try making 400hp powerfor about 500$ in mods to a windsor! do u really think u can? the problem with 4vs are the ports are to large and the aussie heads is the perfect street head closed chambers and 2v ports!
My dad worked for fords drag racing program from 65 to 78, we got alot of bob gliddens old pro stock equipment for testing, he was a cleveland guy, I was a youngin back then but grew up on clevelands, we would spin them to 9k to make 750 hp. The engines are dinosaurs and are becoming rapidly extinct. I been around the block many times with clevelands, please. They are nothing special and the winsor is by far a better design. Let's not talk about the cleveland oiling problems while were on the subject
myshifter is offline  
Old 05-13-2006, 04:29 PM
  #22  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

just have to add restritors and an external line!
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 12:15 AM
  #23  
6mustang6
5th Gear Member
 
6mustang6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,645
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

I dont understand why peoplea are trashing Clevelands. They make massive power compared to windsors. Me and most other people on here would pick a cleveland if put to the test. they make power to easy.
6mustang6 is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 01:14 AM
  #24  
myshifter
I ♥ Acer
 
myshifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,364
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

ORIGINAL: 6mustang6

I dont understand why peoplea are trashing Clevelands. They make massive power compared to windsors. Me and most other people on here would pick a cleveland if put to the test. they make power to easy.
cause in 5-10 years they will be extinct, like I said you need to seriously scour for a useable block core to begin with. They will literally be extinct. Winsor is a much superior design
myshifter is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 01:40 AM
  #25  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

they just stopped making cleve in aussie country!! plenty of block for years to come if it was extinct why would edelbrock start making new heads for them?? the heads are awesome to begin with that why they just started making them!!u still apparently havent looked at the aus ford site??
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 03:21 AM
  #26  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

heres the sound of a healthy cleve http://videos.streetfire.net/video/D0C79348-3BD3-47EF-AB65-10A48F9972E3.htmve!
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 03:24 AM
  #27  
67Rally
2nd Gear Member
 
67Rally's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 237
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

I love Clevelands too. There's no convincing some folks.
67Rally is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 03:27 AM
  #28  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

go watch that vid its of a 65 fastabck it sounds pretty sick i plan on puttin the cleve from my old 72 in my 65 and inject it with a with a t56 from a viper so i can have the .50 sixth gear ratio and runn some steep gears in the rear and it still be driveable!
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 05-14-2006, 02:10 PM
  #29  
daver
2nd Gear Member
 
daver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 385
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

I think for mainly street performance on a budget the the cleve is the way to go, the heads are awesome stock and even if the bottom ends in them arent so $hit hot, street use wouldnt tear them up too quick. However, if you were willing to spend the money on the heads for the windsor, you can make mad power, and the bottom ends are pretty stout to begin with. Really it comes down to personal preference since each engine has one major downfall and is pretty costly to fix. Cleves have the bad bottom and W's have the crappy heads. So it doesnt really matter if you have the money which one you go with.
daver is offline  
Old 05-15-2006, 12:39 AM
  #30  
SuperHoss
2nd Gear Member
 
SuperHoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 261
Default RE: 351W vs 302 vs 289

Given the vast aftermarket of the 302 and 351W, these would be your best choices as far as engines for your car. The 302 fits better in a 64.5-66 but the 351 will require special headers or manifolds to clear the shock towers.

The 351C has potential to be just as powerful as a 351W, originally the 351Cs main restricton was the added weight of the valve-train (not a big issue anymore). The 351W was kept until the 90s and the Cleveland was dropped in the 70s, that is the reason for the big aftermarket for the Windsor (more 351Ws were made). I have found places that will cast 351C blocks, new and improved(ending the core-shift problem), but few and far between; whereas people casting the 351W are numerous(due to the large demand of 351Ws). The demand for the 351C doesn't warrant a large aftermarket, so a small one is in place The old FEs were thought to be gone so there was a small market, but low and behold, the demand increased and the market has started to expand(an example of demand and supply, increased demand means increased supply). If the demand for 351C increases, then the market will begin to grow and expand creating a rival to the 351W. Until a larger aftermarket for the 351C is made, its price will be high and production numbers will be low. Because it is easier to get 351W parts, the 351W is the better(and cheaper) way to go for now. I am a fan of the Cleveland, but I do not have the budget for one, so I stick to the Windsor.
SuperHoss is offline  


Quick Reply: 351W vs 302 vs 289



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.