Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1965 Pace Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #11  
Clu7ch's Avatar
Clu7ch
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,328
From: Where I lay my head is home
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car


ORIGINAL: Soaring

30K for a coupe? I guess I need to get Pace Car written on the side of Ol' Yeller?
no, if it was 100% origional, i'd pay 30K. it's a 64 1/2! maybe if you lived when they were made they aren't as cool. [8D]

with the 302 and in great shape, 10-15K. yours, i'd pay about the same 15K+. it's clean, origional, but the 64 1/2 is the rarest as far as i know. at least for the classics.
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #12  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

That's an interesting theory, in that you think a 64 1/2 (Actually a 65) that was built maybe 2 months before mine would be double in price just because of originality. Mine is original. It was built in the same year. But yet, it is a 65 because it was built after August 17th. However, I guess what you are saying is that a 65 with a 260 or D code 289 or 170 I6 is more original than my C code 289. OK......I can see that.
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #13  
67Sally's Avatar
67Sally
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,964
From:
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

Would any of you seriously by a 64 1/2? That's a meuseum car IMO. For the $ it would cost I'd get a 66 2x2
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #14  
Clu7ch's Avatar
Clu7ch
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,328
From: Where I lay my head is home
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car


ORIGINAL: Soaring

That's an interesting theory, in that you think a 64 1/2 (Actually a 65) that was built maybe 2 months before mine would be double in price just because of originality. Mine is original. It was built in the same year. But yet, it is a 65 because it was built after August 17th.
i wasn't contesting the origionality of your car, Glen. i was saying that it's a 46 1/2 by date. i hear a lot of guys talking about how they are worth more just for that reason. maybe i'm wrong. i think it breaks down to the novelity of it being a "half year".

However, I guess what you are saying is that a 65 with a 260 or D code 289 or 170 I6 is more original than my C code 289. OK......I can see that.
how are those motor codes more origional that your C code?
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #15  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

Take a look at the top right hand side of the main forum, and you will see the research I did regarding the 64 1/2. You will see that my original 65 has differences such as the original Mustang engines being a 170, a D code 289 and a K code 289 before August 17th, 1964. My car has a build date of October. A few months after the demise of the 64 1/2 models, and I have a C code 289.
https://mustangforums.com/ford/1964-mustang.asp
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #16  
Clu7ch's Avatar
Clu7ch
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,328
From: Where I lay my head is home
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

well, by origional, i meant, the motor origionally installed at the factory. but yeah, having the info you provided, the engine codes to match the 64 1/2's would, imo, make them rare. maybe it's just me, but that's my .02 cents
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #17  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

Well, I can tell you that a May, 1964 build date with a D code 289 and generator will not sell for the price you quoted. Even if it is in pristine condition, unless it is a convertible or a K code shelby. Even those are selling in the 20K range or less.
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #18  
Clu7ch's Avatar
Clu7ch
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,328
From: Where I lay my head is home
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car


ORIGINAL: Soaring

Well, I can tell you that a May, 1964 build date with a D code 289 and generator will not sell for the price you quoted. Even if it is in pristine condition, unless it is a convertible or a K code shelby. Even those are selling in the 20K range or less.
well, you shouldn't have told me that.

you should have just gone out, foung one, cleaned it up and made a huge profit off my n00b tusch!
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 04:59 AM
  #19  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

the 65 with alt are a much more refined car over the gen charged cars i could see buying a clean pace car for about 20000.00$ but it would have to be a good car showing minimal wear and the original engine etc? but as said before i would probably just buy another fastback for that kinda money
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 05:07 AM
  #20  
Clu7ch's Avatar
Clu7ch
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,328
From: Where I lay my head is home
Default RE: 1965 Pace Car

that's why i enjoy my diamond in the rough
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djbigskrilla
2005-2014 Mustangs
24
Sep 20, 2022 01:04 AM
chain
New Member Area
6
Aug 17, 2015 08:52 AM
92 5.0stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
4
Aug 13, 2015 06:46 AM
Milan Dragway
Members Rides and Car Show Section
0
Aug 12, 2015 03:43 PM
ccwebb
GT S197 General Discussion
2
Aug 11, 2015 06:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.