Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Too Big?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 01:37 AM
  #1  
badazz68stang's Avatar
badazz68stang
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 445
From:
Default Too Big?

I picked up a Autolite 4100 1.12 to run on my 289. They rate these at 600 cfm. but most people say they dont flow nearly that much, will this be too much carb for my stock 289?
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 02:48 AM
  #2  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default RE: Too Big?

its probably on the upper end.

you may be able to get it jetted down to suit

i ran a 780 DP Holley on a 289. even after rejetting it ran like a pig down low and used every drop i could give it once the revs came up. the compromise worked ok but it was very thirsty. my current 302 runs rings around it for power on a 650 Holley.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #3  
burnettt's Avatar
burnettt
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
From:
Default RE: Too Big?

like aussie said u will have to play with the jets . The 750 on my 289 was too much, but the 600 on it now needs to be jetted up. So i'm going to buy a jet kit from jegs which comes with every jet form 66 to 99 and cost 39.99.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #4  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: Too Big?

The most common 4100 was the 1.12 venturi 600 CFM, and the much rarer 1.08" 480 CFM, are the ones you will come across. The large 600 CFM (1.12) was factory installed on Galaxies and T-Birds with 352, 390 and 428 engines. The small 1.08 was used on "A" and "D" code 289's and 1966 only Galaxie and T-Bird's with 390 and 428 applications. (The big blocks used the small carburetor for emissions reasons.) The "K" code 289 HiPro was fed by unique 1.12 600 CFM manual choke performance calibrated 4100. For a normal to even high performance 289 to function the best it must have a carburetor with around 480 CFM, and until now that meant the 1.08 Autolite. With the smaller size the driveability is flawless, i.e. no hesitation or flat spots and the fuel economy (with a 3.00 to 1 rear end) can exceed 20 miles per gallon. Add to that, the 1/4 mile performance is actually faster than the 600 CFM version. But, good luck in finding a 1.08.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #5  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default RE: Too Big?

hey soaring u got any part numbers on the 1.08 carbs i beileve i got my original laying around here somewhere? my car is an original "A" code i got it is all just disassembled
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #6  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: Too Big?

No Sterphen, I don't. But if you have a 108, then that is the carb you ought to be using.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default RE: Too Big?

my two mixture screws are broken off i gotta get that taken care of[:@]
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 12:09 AM
  #8  
6mustang6's Avatar
6mustang6
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,645
From:
Default RE: Too Big?

Get a 500 CFM Edelbrock.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:13 AM
popsotto
New Member Area
1
Sep 28, 2015 06:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.