Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

What cam would you recommend?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2006, 07:09 AM
  #1  
bl28ma
Thread Starter
 
bl28ma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 43
Default What cam would you recommend?

I'm putting a 87 5.0 motor in my 66 fastback. It has a C4 trans with a 2.8 rear. This what I thought I would do to the motor. Tri-y headers, probably the preformer intake or the air gap intake, 600 carb. What cam would you use? Ford racing preformance has 2 cams that I was looking at. The "B" .480 lift 5100 rpm or the "E" .498 lift 5500 rpm. Thanks for the input.
bl28ma is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:38 PM
  #2  
Mustang Boy
3rd Gear Member
 
Mustang Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 835
Default RE: What cam would you recommend?

the question is wut kind of power output do u want if u want more power and a rougher idle id choose the second one but if u want a smoother idle with less power choose the first its all about personal preference


Mustang Boy is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 01:56 PM
  #3  
bl28ma
Thread Starter
 
bl28ma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 43
Default RE: What cam would you recommend?

I would to like to get more power out of stock motor and let keep the driveability of a street car. I'm not interested in racing on the drag strip. I just want to make sure as a complete package that this combo will work. Hope that helps. Thanks
bl28ma is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 06:33 PM
  #4  
THUMPIN455
5th Gear Member
 
THUMPIN455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marquette Mi
Posts: 3,566
Default RE: What cam would you recommend?

Stock cam is a good cam it just needs better heads. But it is kinda an old school type, like the B303, E303 etc. the 303 type cams work with the stock computer but there are better ones out there.

We never found much difference between them with stock heads, except for the X303. We had the smallest Extreme Energy cam in one with stock heads and it worked real well. Even picked up some mpg with the stock gearing, made a bit more torque in the cruise rpm range.

Instead of a cam swap, I would do a head swap on it, yes it costs more but you can pick up more driveability, detonation resistance and some power with a head swap. I have read really ood things about the AFR series, and next year I will try them on my F150 with the 347 thats being built for it. TFS worked real well on the 5.0s we built in the late 90s.. just some different ideas to think about.
THUMPIN455 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 10:46 PM
  #5  
deadcarnahans
3rd Gear Member
 
deadcarnahans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 590
Default RE: What cam would you recommend?

Since your are running a carb, a custom grind from Comp might be a better choice. You could get a 110 or 112 lobe centers, more duration on the exhaust and eliminate the need for a steel gear on your distributor.
I had this one made: FW 3341 / 3342 HR110.0
It pulls hard up to around 5200 rpm then starts to drop off.
deadcarnahans is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 10:56 PM
  #6  
65mojoe
4th Gear Member
 
65mojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 1,142
Default RE: What cam would you recommend?

you should go check out the 5.0 area, they have tons of responses to questions just like this. From what I remember those guys saying, the FRPP A, B, E, X cams are actually outdated and usually they will then recommend that you go with the Trick Flow Stage 1 cam. Im not sure of the grind specs of this particular cam, but most of the guys recommend the TF one over any of the FRPP cams, especially for an application like your describing.

Just FYI, anything above .480 and below .500 or so will give you better top end performance without the loss of driveability (you'll get a good lopey idle and more torque above 2500rpm). I am running a .500 lift crane energizer cam and it has a killer idle tone and pulls hard from about 2500 to 5500.

Also keep in mind that with the higher pulling cams, you also experience a little loss in low end torque (more noticeable if you are still running the 2.73 freeway gears....not as bad if you jump up to a ratio that gets you up through the rpms quicker).
65mojoe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
10-05-2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 01:02 AM



Quick Reply: What cam would you recommend?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.