Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

289 VS. 351W

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #1  
Jeffs_GTstang's Avatar
Jeffs_GTstang
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
From:
Default 289 VS. 351W

I don't know if I should be coming in here with a classic COUGAR question, but it's all the same, right?

I bought my '68 Cougar with a rebuilt 289 in it. Long story short, I found a mildly broken piston when changing the oil pan gasket. I put it in the garage to start doing some resto. work on it, and am getting ready to make some engine decisions.

Not sure if I should get rid of the 289 and spend my money on a 351W, or fix the piston and spend big on building up the 289, (I'm on a fixed income, so I can't afford to buy and build up a 351). Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
mdvaldosta's Avatar
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,826
From: United States
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

A stock 351w with a cam = badass on a budget
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 12:22 PM
  #3  
69mach1377's Avatar
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,593
From: ABQ, NM, USA
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

Right...more cubes and more cam equal more power!
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 03:17 PM
  #4  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

ORIGINAL: 69mach1377

Right...more cubes and more cam equal more power!
Or take out the shock towers, do a Mustang II front end restoration in put in a 427.
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
horseshoeing's Avatar
horseshoeing
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 590
From:
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

Keep the 289. They are a bed *** motor with some work and yes they are the same.

Everyone thinks a 351 is so much better then a 289. Not so, the 289 has a bore a 351. The rods are longer. The 289 is a very fast rpm motor. It will out run most big blocks in the 1/8 mile. In the 1/4 some will get it. What are you going to do with it? Is it going to be a street rod or a drag car? Block to block the 289 is faster if you spend so money on it.
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #6  
carizzma's Avatar
carizzma
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11
From:
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

Look in to a stroker kit for the 289.
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #7  
horseshoeing's Avatar
horseshoeing
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 590
From:
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

Look into 10 to 1 flat tops. Bore it .30 over. Don't stroke it. If you do that you will have a 351.
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #8  
mdvaldosta's Avatar
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,826
From: United States
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

a 351w has a different block then a 289
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #9  
69FECoupe's Avatar
69FECoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 686
From:
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

A Cougar is alot of car for a 289, even a healthy one. If you plan to use it as a weekend cruiser, the 289 will be fine. If your plan is to bump up the performance, I vote for a 351w. With early heads and flat tops, the 4v was factory rated at 290hp. Add some headers a warmer cam and some gears and that cat will really wake up.
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #10  
69mach1377's Avatar
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,593
From: ABQ, NM, USA
Default RE: 289 VS. 351W

Here...here on the 351. Once again, facts speak louder than opinions. Given the same weight, drive train, tires etc...a car with more power and torque will always run faster than one with less power and torque, no matter what someone thinks or says. Physics just rules...don't even argue.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.