Indulge me
ORIGINAL: Soaring
We don't know who you are, You use a fake avatar pic
We don't know who you are, You use a fake avatar pic
Fake as in not a picture of me? I'm sorry, but this isn't myspace. And who the hell else has a picture of themselves for their avatar?
ORIGINAL: Soaring
and so far your additions have been snipes.
and so far your additions have been snipes.
ORIGINAL: Soaring
but your secretive identity is suspect.
but your secretive identity is suspect.
ORIGINAL: Soaring
So with that, what exactly do you have to offer to this thread?
So with that, what exactly do you have to offer to this thread?
Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).
But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
ORIGINAL: BlackLX
Why is it so important that people know who I am? How is my avatar a fake picture? Fake as in photoshop? FYI, that's a picture of Joe Pesci from the movie Casino.
Why is it so important that people know who I am? How is my avatar a fake picture? Fake as in photoshop? FYI, that's a picture of Joe Pesci from the movie Casino.
Not Myspace, you're killing me. Thanks for the laugh.
Beatiful car James!
The first thing I noticed about the car was the reflection, then I noticed how deep the base color is, then I noticed the woodwork on the wall behind the car. I never even noticed the "oversized wheels" (which, by-the-way, look fine to me) until I was reading the comments and saw Glen bashing yet another beautiful Mustang with modifications. I think it is really revealing what people notice and post about when they first see a picture of a car. Some people see beauty and make positive comments and some people see what they don't like and make negative comments. That really tells me what type of person someone is.
For the record Glen, I have only seen BlackLX make two comments that could be what you refer to as "sniping". Funny enough, both of those comments were in threads where you first posted negative comments about another car. Also, I'd say the vast majority (possibly 95%+) of the people who post here, including yourself, use what you call a "fake" avatar picture. There is no rule that states you have to use a real picture of yourself for your avatar, nor is there a rule that states you have to fill in the name field in the profile page.
As far as my contribution to this thread... I think it is a beautiful car! What other information do you have about it JamesW?
For the record Glen, I have only seen BlackLX make two comments that could be what you refer to as "sniping". Funny enough, both of those comments were in threads where you first posted negative comments about another car. Also, I'd say the vast majority (possibly 95%+) of the people who post here, including yourself, use what you call a "fake" avatar picture. There is no rule that states you have to use a real picture of yourself for your avatar, nor is there a rule that states you have to fill in the name field in the profile page.
As far as my contribution to this thread... I think it is a beautiful car! What other information do you have about it JamesW?
ORIGINAL: baddog671
Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).
But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).
But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
I think thats a great looking car whichever it is...i'd be pretty happy if it were sitting in my shed
James you tease! Post some more pics and details
ORIGINAL: Aussie66Fastback
correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought none of the 65/66 fastbacks had scoops just the verts and coupes?
I think thats a great looking car whichever it is...i'd be pretty happy if it were sitting in my shed
James you tease! Post some more pics and details
ORIGINAL: baddog671
Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).
But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).
But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
I think thats a great looking car whichever it is...i'd be pretty happy if it were sitting in my shed
James you tease! Post some more pics and details


