Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Indulge me

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 03:21 AM
  #21  
BlackLX's Avatar
BlackLX
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,576
From:
Default RE: Indulge me

ORIGINAL: Soaring
We don't know who you are, You use a fake avatar pic
Why is it so important that people know who I am? How is my avatar a fake picture? Fake as in photoshop? FYI, that's a picture of Joe Pesci from the movie Casino.

Fake as in not a picture of me? I'm sorry, but this isn't myspace. And who the hell else has a picture of themselves for their avatar?

ORIGINAL: Soaring
and so far your additions have been snipes.
That's funny coming from someone who's every other post is "that's a bastard of a classic mustang."

ORIGINAL: Soaring
but your secretive identity is suspect.
LOL

ORIGINAL: Soaring
So with that, what exactly do you have to offer to this thread?
Maybe you should ask yourself that question.
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 03:40 AM
  #22  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default RE: Indulge me

Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).

But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 03:58 AM
  #23  
gothand's Avatar
gothand
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,287
From: North Fulton, GA
Default RE: Indulge me

ORIGINAL: BlackLX
Why is it so important that people know who I am? How is my avatar a fake picture? Fake as in photoshop? FYI, that's a picture of Joe Pesci from the movie Casino.
Damn, that's not you in the avatar? All this time I thought we had a celebrity on the board. Not Myspace, you're killing me. Thanks for the laugh.

Beatiful car James!
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #24  
67 evil eleanor's Avatar
67 evil eleanor
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,106
From:
Default RE: Indulge me

Can we still see under the hood?
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 04:23 PM
  #25  
NorCalTroy's Avatar
NorCalTroy
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 542
From: Sacramento, CA
Default RE: Indulge me

The first thing I noticed about the car was the reflection, then I noticed how deep the base color is, then I noticed the woodwork on the wall behind the car. I never even noticed the "oversized wheels" (which, by-the-way, look fine to me) until I was reading the comments and saw Glen bashing yet another beautiful Mustang with modifications. I think it is really revealing what people notice and post about when they first see a picture of a car. Some people see beauty and make positive comments and some people see what they don't like and make negative comments. That really tells me what type of person someone is.

For the record Glen, I have only seen BlackLX make two comments that could be what you refer to as "sniping". Funny enough, both of those comments were in threads where you first posted negative comments about another car. Also, I'd say the vast majority (possibly 95%+) of the people who post here, including yourself, use what you call a "fake" avatar picture. There is no rule that states you have to use a real picture of yourself for your avatar, nor is there a rule that states you have to fill in the name field in the profile page.

As far as my contribution to this thread... I think it is a beautiful car! What other information do you have about it JamesW?
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 08:47 PM
  #26  
EmperorOfChicken's Avatar
EmperorOfChicken
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,170
From: Texas
Default RE: Indulge me

hey that car is my schools colors, green and gold
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #27  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default RE: Indulge me

ORIGINAL: baddog671

Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).

But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought none of the 65/66 fastbacks had scoops just the verts and coupes?
I think thats a great looking car whichever it is...i'd be pretty happy if it were sitting in my shed

James you tease! Post some more pics and details
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #28  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default RE: Indulge me

ORIGINAL: Aussie66Fastback

ORIGINAL: baddog671

Mustang is a `65. It has the headlight bucket gills (64-66) and doesnt have any form of sidescoop(65&68).

But I've seen some tricky `66's without sidescoops. Not sure if the owner removes them or they were like that stock.
correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought none of the 65/66 fastbacks had scoops just the verts and coupes?
I think thats a great looking car whichever it is...i'd be pretty happy if it were sitting in my shed

James you tease! Post some more pics and details
I used the word scoop too losely. The 66 has the "3-prong" and the 65 has nothing there.
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #29  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default RE: Indulge me

you mean my car should have scoops?
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #30  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default RE: Indulge me

I just say sidescoops becuase "ornamate in the sidescoop vacinity" is alittle long..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.