Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

GT mustang or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #1  
hardy's Avatar
hardy
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
Default GT mustang or not?

Ok I'm a new mustang owner and have a 1965 mustang coupe. what makes a car a real coupe and not one that was built. I read that there were like over 600,000 mustangs made in 65 but only 15,000 GT cars It would be very easy to clone a GT if the vin numbers dont clearly clarify it as a GT car. my vin number shows a few things that look to be GT options. How can I verify my 65 as a 1965GT

5R07A226728
65 B 68 74 1 6

I looked up the above numbers but I did not see anything that came right out and called this car a GT
thanks in advance
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #2  
connor90's Avatar
connor90
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,195
From:
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

GT's came with two different engine options, the K code and the A code, the A code had about 225hp and the K was putting out about 271hp.you have an Aand that enginewas used in both GT and non-GT models so its really hard to say. i think that if it seems like it is unrestored and has all of the GT options like fog lights and all that good stuff then its most likely a GT. im pretty sure that is accurate but if not im sure someone will correct me
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #3  
hardy's Avatar
hardy
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

I bought this car only because it looked so nice and had to sell my 69 road runner to pay for it. What would a 1965 GT in mint condition be worth or how can I find this info out. from a scale of 1 to 10 being concoures, this car is a 9 1/2 28,000 miles on car
I'm a mopar guyand Ford now,but hope I bought this car right
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #4  
hardy's Avatar
hardy
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

The car is totally restored to Ford specifications
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #5  
connor90's Avatar
connor90
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,195
From:
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

wow...do you have any pictures? id say that you would probably be able to get around $15-$20K if its really as nice as you say it is...at least thats how much i would pay for it but again i live in my own little world, its called the world of no money
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #6  
connor90's Avatar
connor90
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,195
From:
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

ORIGINAL: hardy

The car is totally restored to Ford specifications
hmm well its hard to say then...does it have all the GT options on it. the only thing is that if it does have those optionsthey could have been added during the resto.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #7  
colostang's Avatar
colostang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 299
From:
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

If it has original running gear and accessories. If it is 9.5/10 including body, paint, interior and engine compartment. And if it is an A code (never mind the GT).

My guess would be 24k.

One way to evaluate a 65 to see if it a real GT is see if it has rocker panel mouldings. GT's did not come with these in 65. Should have a tach that goes to 6000 rpm, a clock, round speedometer, fog lights and disc brakes in front. I am sure there are other things but I can't recall.

Pictures?

Edit, the reason I say never mind the GT is because unless you have the original sales documentation it is hard to prove on a 65' what it really is. Even with a dealer bill of sale it is possible the dealer added the GT options and it wouldn't be an original "factory" GT. Oh yeah, the GT's in 65' had a quicker steering box too.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #8  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

ORIGINAL: colostang

If it has original running gear and accessories. If it is 9.5/10 including body, paint, interior and engine compartment. And if it is an A code (never mind the GT).

My guess would be 24k.

One way to evaluate a 65 to see if it a real GT is see if it has rocker panel mouldings. GT's did not come with these in 65. Should have a tach that goes to 6000 rpm, a clock, round speedometer, fog lights and disc brakes in front. I am sure there are other things but I can't recall.

Pictures?

Edit, the reason I say never mind the GT is because unless you have the original sales documentation it is hard to prove on a 65' what it really is. Even with a dealer bill of sale it is possible the dealer added the GT options and it wouldn't be an original "factory" GT. Oh yeah, the GT's in 65' had a quicker steering box too.
You got most of them. Along with the badges, the rear exhaust exited through the rear valance.
Yeah, that is a 20 grand car. Sure would be nice to see some pics though.
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #9  
connor90's Avatar
connor90
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,195
From:
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

[sm=ttiwwp.gif]



sorry...ive always wanted to do that
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #10  
hardy's Avatar
hardy
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
Default RE: GT mustang or not?

I'm going to take some pics now and will post them if I can figure out how be back in a few This car is clean thanks for all the info
One thing first I have the bill of sale it reads as follows:
1965 mustange two door hardtop
equipped with:
695x14 WSW tires
tinted glass
Cruisomatic
radio
Visibility Group
Backuu lights
225 V/8 motor
Decor Group
Special handling Package
Retractable belts
Under coat



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.