Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #31  
mikethebike's Avatar
mikethebike
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 551
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose


ORIGINAL: Soaring

My recommendation would be to throw that friggin Holley in the trash and put on a decent carb like a motorcraft that these engines were designed to run with. They certainly were not designed to run with a freak EFI system.
You really need to get past this unreasonable hatred of Holley carbs.
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #32  
gothand's Avatar
gothand
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,287
From: North Fulton, GA
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

ORIGINAL: colostang

What is that yellow car in your signature Soaring? I can't tell because the wheels and tires have modified it beyond recognition.
So understated, yet so freaking hilarious! [sm=devilangel.gif]

Any emotional attachmentes aside, I'm betting that 9 out of 10 guys on this board with real "Mustangs" would trade straight up for Jim's creation without thinking twice.[sm=bustedsign.gif]

To the OP, give it your best shot doing the obvious stuff first. Make sure you're plugs/wires/cap/rotor are in good shape and the timing/vac advance are rightso you know you're getting good spark. Make sure the fuel pressure is where it has to be and the float levels are properly set. Get a vacuum guage and make sure your idle mixture is adjusted properly and make sure your accelerator pump is squirting gas.

If it still isn't running correctly, you've got some decisions to make. Like James mentioned, a new carb can be had at a reasonable price, especially if you're not up to rebuilding one yourself. Myself, I've always considered the 600-cfm Holleys to be 'disposable' in that it is almost easier to sell your old one on Ebay and pick up a new one for a few hundred bucks. That isn't the path many will be happy with, but so be it.

If I were you, and you don't feel a need to do everything yourself, I'd find a good dynotuner in town and get them to dial it in. I paid $150 to get my new Ford Racing crate motor, MSD dizzy and Edelbrock Thunder AVS carb all dialed in. The thing rolled off of the trailer as a dog and was an all new vehicle when I picked it up. I'm pretty good with a wrench, but I don't pretend to have half the ability and "feel" for tune that somebody who has been doing it for nearly 40 years does.

Good luck!
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #33  
66GTKFB's Avatar
66GTKFB
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,623
From:
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

Shelby put a 4150, a high rise manifold and headers on a 289 Hi-Po engine, an engine already built for more than average horsepower output. That engine was not a 'C' code or an 'A' code. An overcarbureted car blows gas out the tailpipe.
Jim
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #34  
highhilleer's Avatar
highhilleer
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 490
From:
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

ORIGINAL: Soaring

My recommendation would be to throw that friggin Holley in the trash and put on a decent carb like a motorcraft that these engines were designed to run with. They certainly were not designed to run with a freak EFI system.
Must be a suprise to all those Holley owners who think it's a great carb!!! That would include Mr. Edelbrock who runs Holley on his vintage race Mustangs and of course Mr. Shelby! The motorcraft carbs are also excellent, but must be properlyrebuilt and tuned. Pony Carbs makes their living providing this service for the "simple" motorcraft/Autolite carbs.

I agree with the suggesion that the problem is with the carb. It may need something as simple as adjustments or it may need a rebuild. I would follow this path before replacing it.

Soaring - there is a concours forum at Vintage Mustang Forum that you may enjoy. They really get into how to replace paint marking codes place by Ford during assembly. Those boys and girls have the only real classic mustangs.
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/showforum.php?fid/14/
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 08:11 PM
  #35  
mat11089's Avatar
mat11089
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 702
From:
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

ORIGINAL: Soaring

ORIGINAL: JamesW

ORIGINAL: Soaring

My recommendation would be to throw that friggin Holley in the trash and put on a decent carb like a motorcraft that these engines were designed to run with. They certainly were not designed to run with a freak EFI system.
hey heyyyyy.... 5.0s were updated in the late 80s to run with a freak EFI system... I'm not a fan of putting EFI on an original 289 or 302 either.....
Well guess what Jimbo, these old 1960's model cars were invented about 20 years before the 80's EFI engines. I think you have a very decent restomod, but it is just that, a restomodwith not identity other than your signature car. It is not original in any respect, but it is what you built for you personally. That is fine, but don't pass it off as a Mustang.
That is most certainly a mustang.I understand that you do not like restomod but i dont think its fair that you tell people to not consider their cars mustangs just because you dont like it.Thats not a fair statement.I dont personal like your classic style but im not gonna tell you its not this or that.This hobby is about Driving,repairing, and making our cars better and the way we like.Way to go James,very nice car
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #36  
Hornblower's Avatar
Hornblower
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 148
From: USA
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

ORIGINAL: JamesW

Patrick..you just keep asking all the restomod questions you want man.... we'll try to help.

Just ignore Glen. He's just [sm=icon_stickpoke.gif]cuz he enjoy's it and likes to get a rise out of me sometimes.

James, you have a very nice restomod, but it is no longer a classic Mustang. I believe what Soaring is saying is that there is a point in time when a classic mustang is no longer a classic mustang when you put EFI engines, digital gaugepods and such in them. Sure the shell may still resemble a classic mustang, but it sure isn't a classic mustang. Again, you have a really nice restomod, but it is no longer a classic Mustang. Face it.
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 10:47 PM
  #37  
JamesW's Avatar
JamesW
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,302
From: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

ORIGINAL: Hornblower

ORIGINAL: JamesW

Patrick..you just keep asking all the restomod questions you want man.... we'll try to help.

Just ignore Glen. He's just [sm=icon_stickpoke.gif]cuz he enjoy's it and likes to get a rise out of me sometimes.

James, you have a very nice restomod, but it is no longer a classic Mustang. I believe what Soaring is saying is that there is a point in time when a classic mustang is no longer a classic mustang when you put EFI engines, digital gaugepods and such in them. Sure the shell may still resemble a classic mustang, but it sure isn't a classic mustang. Again, you have a really nice restomod, but it is no longer a classic Mustang. Face it.

Colt,

Just who in the hell do you think you are addressing me specifically and telling me what my car is or is not? You have no idea who I am, or what my car consists of. I am appalled that someone would go out of their way to voice such an asinine and stupid opinion, and infer that someone else's car is or is not anything. This tread has nothing to do with my car, yet you seemed to think you have the right to insult me and my vehicle. Perhaps you would feel better if I just took a personal attack on you and your vehicle.

Glen, I blame you for this idiotic environment you have forstered where people think they can insult others rather than address the topics at hand.

I, nor ANYONE ELSE on this board could give a rat's *** about your opinion of my car.
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 12:56 AM
  #38  
restomod87's Avatar
restomod87
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 159
From:
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

Admin please close this thread due to childishness...JamesW Please forgive me for starting this thread in the first place, no one has any right to post like that, and should be warned when flaming and bashing begins. I'm sending this thread to Amanda to take a look at, As a moderator, I expect better from Soaring ( Or anyone else who monitors the Classic message boards ).
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 02:19 AM
  #39  
andrewmp6's Avatar
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

fuel injection is nothing new on a mustang in 68 shelbys exp gt500 had fuel injection and irs
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 02:29 AM
  #40  
66GTKFB's Avatar
66GTKFB
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,623
From:
Default RE: Pedal to floor= bad performance? please diagnose

Andrew,
Could you clarify that statement about 68 Shelby's?
Jim



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.