WHAT IS IT WORTH
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
From:
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
ORIGINAL: Fastbackkid
Okay everyone,
This ismy latest project restoration, everything has been replaced on this car down to the last bolt to make this car look the way it does. It has a 390-ci engine with power disc brakes all the way around. I have added nothing to the motor than the factory equipment. I have everything on this car done right even to the rims with a 10-spoke style. The interior is all refinished with the same disign but with different color code. The reason I am posting this car is cause I am thinking about selling it. I want your opinion on what you think I should start it out at. I was thinking around $26,000. The motor has only 3400 miles on it since installed. It was totally rebuilt with all new parts. I went with power disc brakes from a 1987 mustang 5.0 for better braking abilty. There is not on flaw on this car, nor bondo.
Scroll down a few comments and I have posted pics of the motor.
Okay everyone,
This ismy latest project restoration, everything has been replaced on this car down to the last bolt to make this car look the way it does. It has a 390-ci engine with power disc brakes all the way around. I have added nothing to the motor than the factory equipment. I have everything on this car done right even to the rims with a 10-spoke style. The interior is all refinished with the same disign but with different color code. The reason I am posting this car is cause I am thinking about selling it. I want your opinion on what you think I should start it out at. I was thinking around $26,000. The motor has only 3400 miles on it since installed. It was totally rebuilt with all new parts. I went with power disc brakes from a 1987 mustang 5.0 for better braking abilty. There is not on flaw on this car, nor bondo.
Scroll down a few comments and I have posted pics of the motor.
superdavid: did you get the VTEC option as well?
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
The original GT 350's had a modified 289 K code engine that got just over 300 horsepower. That is the only engine they ever had because the 302, 351, 390, 428 or whatever had not even been invented. Now, starting in 67 the GT 500 got the 390.
6th Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,469
From: AR
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
ORIGINAL: EmperorOfChicken
the paint looks REALLY nice to me, and thats a big deal to some people. 26 sounds about right for a fastback in good shape, you might get more, maybe less. id do what soaring said and ebay it or craigslist it for 26g reserve.
the paint looks REALLY nice to me, and thats a big deal to some people. 26 sounds about right for a fastback in good shape, you might get more, maybe less. id do what soaring said and ebay it or craigslist it for 26g reserve.
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
ORIGINAL: Aussie66Fastback
it would appear to me that the car pics and the engine bay are not of the same vehicle.
390 was never an option, never used in the GT 350, any year.
Sure as hell wouldnt fit in a 66 engine bay without some major mods
ORIGINAL: Bulldog66
[sm=WTFsgign.gif]
[sm=WTFsgign.gif]
390 was never an option, never used in the GT 350, any year.
Sure as hell wouldnt fit in a 66 engine bay without some major mods
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
From: West Virginia
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
ORIGINAL: Soaring
The original GT 350's had a modified 289 K code engine that got just over 300 horsepower. That is the only engine they ever had because the 302, 351, 390, 428 or whatever had not even been invented. Now, starting in 67 the GT 500 got the 390.
The original GT 350's had a modified 289 K code engine that got just over 300 horsepower. That is the only engine they ever had because the 302, 351, 390, 428 or whatever had not even been invented. Now, starting in 67 the GT 500 got the 390.
Something about this thread doesn't add up
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 686
From:
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
The engine compartment pictures he posted are not those of a 65/66 Mustang. The radiator support and hold down bracket are from a 69/70 and the shock towers are not modified, the shock absorber mounts are clearly visible. If it was a Fox body front clip, it would have McPhereson struts, not shocks. It's not the same car that he posted the pictures of in his first post, the white stripes are also gone. Can you say, pullin our chain?
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 702
From:
RE: WHAT IS IT WORTH
This kid thinks were a bunch of idiots.None of his stuff made any sense nor did his pics match.Shock towers still there,no stripes, his facts about motors in vehicles are all wrong .Does anyone else feel he doesnt belong here well at least sharing useless info.