Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

65 or 67 Battery tray

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #11  
JamesW's Avatar
JamesW
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,302
From: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Default RE: 65 or 67 Battery tray

ORIGINAL: gothand

With that mod you can fit a larger radiator if you so desire. If you're staying with the stock sized radiator, I'm not sure if there is a benefit.
What he said....
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #12  
baddog671's Avatar
baddog671
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,736
From: MD/WV
Default RE: 65 or 67 Battery tray

Taylor makes a nice polished aluminum battery relocation kit for about 80 bucks. Same as the 200$ Steeda kit without the name embossed on the cover. Dunno how much the power wire would cost for that extra distance, but it would convert weight off the nose to above the wheel and give you more engine bay room...
Old Jun 23, 2007 | 12:41 AM
  #13  
66JameStang's Avatar
66JameStang
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,407
From: New Mexico
Default RE: 65 or 67 Battery tray

It really depends if you need the space or where you need the space. If you want a bigger radiator use the 67 tray. If you like the stock look and don't have room issues go with a 65 66 tray you already have the holes for it? If you need a lot of space and don't mind paying a few bucks trunk relocation may be right up your alley. There are kits that do a good job of giving you a decent price and plenty ofwire for the job at hand. So once again, it all comes down to you...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BOB ROME
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Jul 26, 2023 01:54 PM
4cylinderplus2
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
10
Oct 9, 2020 07:45 PM
logan409
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
10
Sep 26, 2015 07:43 PM
wilsonro
4 Cylinder NA and Turbo
0
Sep 11, 2015 07:13 AM
Art161
2005-2014 Mustangs
2
Sep 9, 2015 10:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.