1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
Jul 17, 2007 | 09:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
i think you might need an rmodel fromt valance to adaquetly cool the intercooler at least the street type. hot rod had a 2.3t falcon in as a feature i believe a few years ago
Jul 17, 2007 | 09:23 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 31
From:
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
Hmmmm.. I don't want the R model valance, but I also don't want to cut the front of the car up.
Jul 17, 2007 | 09:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 452
From: baltimore,Md
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
You might be able to design some vents that mount behind the bumper but pull air from the underside of the bumper.
Jul 17, 2007 | 10:53 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,445
From:
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
.....
Last edited by Scott H.; Jan 18, 2010 at 08:39 PM .
Jul 17, 2007 | 11:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,576
From: Salisbury NC
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
[sm=ttiwwp.gif]
Jul 18, 2007 | 12:58 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
its not a bad idea the 2.3 can be a monster but im done with imports and small engines too much money to make ok power but good luck with it.
Jul 18, 2007 | 03:24 AM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 31
From:
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
I'm shooting for 250-275 rwhp. I think that can easily be done.
Jul 18, 2007 | 03:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
BFD. You can make that with an I6 200
Jul 18, 2007 | 10:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,688
From: Ramona, CA
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
Sounds cool man,, Keep us posted on the project.
Jul 18, 2007 | 12:51 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 31
From:
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
The 200 is a great engine, but not my style.
RE: 1966 2.3 Turbo Mustang
