Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

new to old

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #1  
snoopy9900's Avatar
snoopy9900
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Default new to old

Im looking to put a 96 4.6 in my 1966 coupe is it possible?
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:27 PM
  #2  
66GTKFB's Avatar
66GTKFB
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,623
From:
Default RE: new to old

The 4.6 won't fit withoutreplacing the entire front suspension including the shock towers. It was done and featureda while back in Mustang Monthly Magazine.
Jim
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #3  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: new to old

Look up the SN 65 thread. If you are rich, go for it and expect to pay a large thou to get her dun. It is about the stupidest mod that I can think of for the money spent to get it done.
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #4  
Daze's Avatar
Daze
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 877
From:
Default RE: new to old

Soaring, I think that you have failed realize that for many of us who "modify" it is not about "changing" our cars, but rather the challenge of making two things that were not designed to work together function together as if they had been originally designed that way. With the correct fabrication skills such a modification can be made with out spindling tones of money. I have nothing against those that rebuild what they have, but I like a challenge.
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #5  
JamesW's Avatar
JamesW
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,302
From: Northernish Eastish Central Texas
Default RE: new to old

Don't you have a plane to catch or something......?
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #6  
Daze's Avatar
Daze
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 877
From:
Default RE: new to old

Nope, been there done that
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 09:05 PM
  #7  
connor90's Avatar
connor90
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,195
From:
Default RE: new to old

im still not sure why someone would want to put a 4.6 in a 66 when it would be easier to get a 351, stroke it out to a 408, do a little trimming to the shock towers and in the end have a lot more power than that 4.6. probably will end up costing less also.

remember there is no replacement for displacement
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 10:02 PM
  #8  
jcomp's Avatar
jcomp
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 293
From:
Default RE: new to old


ORIGINAL: connor90

im still not sure why someone would want to put a 4.6 in a 66 when it would be easier to get a 351, stroke it out to a 408, do a little trimming to the shock towers and in the end have a lot more power than that 4.6. probably will end up costing less also.

remember there is no replacement for displacement
Because it would be challenging and you'd end up with something a little different than the average stroker engine in your car. At least, that's why I would consider doing it.

Old Jul 20, 2007 | 11:43 PM
  #9  
BillyBobJoe's Avatar
BillyBobJoe
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,138
From: FL
Default RE: new to old

Reality is though, the '96 4.6 may be a little more fuel efficient because of its fuel injection, but it doesnt really put out much more power than a well taken care of 289/302. Especially in these old heavy cars. I'd rather put in a newer 4.6, at least from 99+ with the PI heads. Or just convert your current engine to fuel injection. Swapping a 5.0 setup to the 289 and 302 has been done before a couple times, and if tuned right you can get some serious power out of it.
Old Jul 21, 2007 | 12:34 AM
  #10  
95gtdrop's Avatar
95gtdrop
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 251
From:
Default RE: new to old

if your gonna go through all the trouble, you might as well do it big and put a 03-04 cobra motor in it.
if not, spend that money on a 351 crate!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.