Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Duraspark or Pertronix

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #1  
CrashBob's Avatar
CrashBob
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 63
From:
Default Duraspark or Pertronix

I am real confused,betweenthe articles I've been reading, I can't figure out which is the better, most bang for the buck way to go with the ignition on my '65 IL6. I'm kind of leaning towards the Duraspark because of the purported HEI possibilities. Question: is the Pertronixmodule considered to beHEI and perform accordingly?[/align][/align]Would some of you guys with actual experience in these matters pleasestep in with some input? Positive or negative,I need some help here.[/align][/align]Thanks,[/align]CrashBob[/align]
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #2  
dozierstang's Avatar
dozierstang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 359
From:
Default RE: Duraspark or Pertronix

I have a pertronix on the 67 and a billit pro MSD system on the 69. Both in my opinion perform the same. With the pertronix costing much less. I highly recommend the pertronix. If the MSD did not already come on the 69 then I would have gone pertronix. NICE avatar by the way.
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #3  
CrashBob's Avatar
CrashBob
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 63
From:
Default RE: Duraspark or Pertronix

ORIGINAL: dozierstang

[/align] NICE avatar by the way.
[/align][/align]Thanks! You ought to see her for real.[/align]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KEM Motorworks
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
20
Aug 14, 2015 10:13 PM
plainsmen
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
9
Jun 30, 2006 11:48 PM
Soaring
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
1
May 6, 2005 03:27 PM
TheGmKiller331
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
0
Feb 16, 2004 07:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.