fwhp.


he means FLYWHEEL, not front wheel.

 

Well then my question is ,, is the performer cam better than stock?? Will it out perform the stock cam??

If the answer is yes, then I am happy..

 

just take it to the track. thats where it matters. oh, and race other cars on the street. and get there mod list too.

 

[sm=boosign.gif]

 

*****,

 

Very elegant retort.

So how exactly do I ask someone what mods they have done to their car after I have just blown their doors off and continued on my route with them growing ever smaller in my rear view mirror?

 

yes it will make about 10-15 hp and about 20-30 ft lbs more than the stock cam with all being the same but it it works better with an intake and carb, its a great cam for low end torque/mileage and thats what its designed for. When you get a taste of more power......I guarantee you will want more......

 

And to specify to mr. hotwllz as you can obviously tell , his engine is a 69. Who cares about 71 and on ?

Its irrelavant ...

Just pointing it out , so HP and TQ stand at initial guesses , ..

And lastly , we are referring to the Engine! .... not the car!! .. Duhhh......

 

Yes the Performer cam is better than stock, but it's not exactly what most of us would consider a street "performance" cam, let alone high performance

 

exactly, not trying to rain on your parade but dont expect much from a performer cam/ int on a 351w, on a 289-302 it has a very noticable difference over stock 2bbl and cam. the cam is same specs for a 351w, I dont know why butedelbrock makes a performer cam for a 5.8 (351w) probably injected but the specs are 210 216 469 484 @0.50 which sounds more like it should be for the increased displacement. The main thing is if your happy with the performance thats all that counts....