302, 351 or a 390 engine ?
Ive currently purchased a 68 fastback project car with the suspension completed. Now its on to the engine. My goal is to make this thing haul *** as ihave already completedmy street-friendly 69 coupe.
Which engine you guys think would be more optimal? Money is not a factor as i dont plan on having this thing done anytime soon. I plan to take it slow and enjoy every bit of it. Im looking forward to your responses.
Which engine you guys think would be more optimal? Money is not a factor as i dont plan on having this thing done anytime soon. I plan to take it slow and enjoy every bit of it. Im looking forward to your responses.
in 1967 there was a mustang with a 390 geared towards high performance and lee Iococa dubbed it the "fat pig".....i'll be home in about 45mins and ill give you the history and the specs on it.
Mine was supposed to be a 390.. It's not worth it, performance wise.. If you're trying to stay original, (I don't even know if yours IS an s-code?) then give'r if you want, but if you want performance, I agree with the 351 stroked.. Or blown.. I'd say blown, myself. Hell, 5.0 supercharged.. how much horsepower are you looking for?
1967 fat pig
1967 mustang with a 390 fe
weight ratio 60.3/39.7
water cooled cast iron v-8
boreXstroke =4.05x3.78
capacity 390ci (6.4l)
compression 10.5:1
fuelling 4bbl carb
power 320bhp @4600rpm's
1967 mustang with a 390 fe
weight ratio 60.3/39.7
water cooled cast iron v-8
boreXstroke =4.05x3.78
capacity 390ci (6.4l)
compression 10.5:1
fuelling 4bbl carb
power 320bhp @4600rpm's


