Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1969 - meanest stance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #41  
TexasAxMan's Avatar
TexasAxMan
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,692
From: Houston, Texas
Default RE: 1969 - meanest stance?

Dang Deviousfred, is that yours? Love it, love it, love it.

For the rest, '66 was the only year, they got all the 64.5-65 bugs out and all was well with the world. After that, they spent years trying to recapture the splendor of the '66, but alas, they were never quite able to.

Geeeez, I would have thought a bunch of Mustang fanatics would have know that already ......
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #42  
Waffles's Avatar
Waffles
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,553
From: Detroit; where the weak are killed and eaten.
Default RE: 1969 - meanest stance?

much like the boobies in texasaxmans avatar, small ones (like 64-66) are ok. a little bigger, a little better (67-68), a good sized handful around a c-d cup is perfect (69-70), but rollin onto DD and up (71-73) just gets to be a little gaudy.

I personally like a nice C-D cup.

But if you like cars made for training bras... thats your call.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spectreman
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
23
Mar 31, 2016 09:26 PM
robcy
Suspension
1
Oct 27, 2015 11:14 PM
LiquidDrink
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
8
Sep 29, 2015 10:06 AM
robjh22
Suspension
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:47 PM
S'PortMustang69
Motor Swap Section
5
Aug 30, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.