Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Headers on a 289

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
snorulz's Avatar
snorulz
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 277
From: WI
Default RE: Headers on a 289

i have a 69 with a 302, i bought Hooker Competition longtube headers. They bolted up and fit perfect. The only thing was the powersteering cylinder would just graze it occasionally so i put on the bracket that lowers the cylinder and now there is plenty of room. They are very economical, only $160 at summit.
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #12  
ninteen66mustang's Avatar
ninteen66mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 923
From: Colorado
Default RE: Headers on a 289

i think im gonna do the same thing. long tubes and purple hornies...

so which headers bolt up without any problems on a 66 with p/s? also, do all headers come with exhaust gaskets?

not trying to rob the thread... sorry...
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #13  
David09sp's Avatar
David09sp
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 125
From:
Default RE: Headers on a 289

I went with a pair of Flowtech headers instead of hookers, or patriots etc. Honestly I like the sound of the long tubes beter. Anywho I have a 351 winsor, but it wasnt a big deal getting them on didnt need the bracket, was a b**** to get in that tight area though.

Almost the same ones I bought...
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...p;autoview=sku
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 01:18 AM
  #14  
Montanas Mustang's Avatar
Montanas Mustang
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
From:
Default RE: Headers on a 289

I would agree with snorulz. I have a '68 and put Hooker Comps on it. Bolted up no problem even with the P/S. I think the long tubes give better performance than the tri-Y's. The longer tubes seem to equalize the back-pressure better than the shorty's or tri-Y's. That's just my opinion. They will also probably make for a more agressive sound, especially with the Purps. I would advise spending the money on some good header wrap ($60-100 from Summit/JEGs) or making a heat shield. It will save you the price in P/S hoses in the long run.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #15  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Headers on a 289

Long tubes like Hooker Super Competitions, the ones with the smaller primaries, 1 5/8" not the 1 3/4".
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 02:53 AM
  #16  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default RE: Headers on a 289

ORIGINAL: Montanas Mustang

I would agree with snorulz. I have a '68 and put Hooker Comps on it. Bolted up no problem even with the P/S. I think the long tubes give better performance than the tri-Y's. The longer tubes seem to equalize the back-pressure better than the shorty's or tri-Y's. That's just my opinion. They will also probably make for a more agressive sound, especially with the Purps. I would advise spending the money on some good header wrap ($60-100 from Summit/JEGs) or making a heat shield. It will save you the price in P/S hoses in the long run.
on a drag car maxed out in the rev range then yes the longtubes give better performance.
on a street car operating at lower revs and over a range, tri-ys are suposed to give better scavenging for improved fuel economyand more bottom endtorque.

tri-y is a style not a brand. I had power steering and tri-ys in my 66 with no clearance issues. i have since ditched the p/s.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #17  
baxsom's Avatar
baxsom
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 242
Default RE: Headers on a 289

ORIGINAL: Montanas Mustang

I would agree with snorulz. I have a '68 and put Hooker Comps on it. Bolted up no problem even with the P/S. I think the long tubes give better performance than the tri-Y's. The longer tubes seem to equalize the back-pressure better than the shorty's or tri-Y's. That's just my opinion. They will also probably make for a more agressive sound, especially with the Purps. I would advise spending the money on some good header wrap ($60-100 from Summit/JEGs) or making a heat shield. It will save you the price in P/S hoses in the long run.
you would be better off putting the header wrap on the power steering hoses.

header wrap will kill the header. even wrapped stainless steel will eventually rust when wrapped. between the trapped in moisture and the trapped in heat the last set of headers i wrapped.(stainless on a motorcycle) rusted through in less than a year
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
ninteen66mustang's Avatar
ninteen66mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 923
From: Colorado
Default RE: Headers on a 289


ORIGINAL: 67mustang302

Long tubes like Hooker Super Competitions, the ones with the smaller primaries, 1 5/8" not the 1 3/4".
that is what I was looking at. will those fit on my p/s equipped 66 without any problems?
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #19  
Montanas Mustang's Avatar
Montanas Mustang
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 50
From:
Default RE: Headers on a 289

[/quote]
you would be better off putting the header wrap on the power steering hoses.

header wrap will kill the header. even wrapped stainless steel will eventually rust when wrapped. between the trapped in moisture and the trapped in heat the last set of headers i wrapped.(stainless on a motorcycle) rusted through in less than a year

[/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but if the headers are in good shape, clean, and dry, when wrapped they should be OK. I have seen lots more unwrapped, rusty, nasty, problem causing headers than I have seen wrapped headers that failed. Everyone has their own preference but I think the benefits (lower engine compartment temp, less problems with hoses/lines/wiring next to the headers, and just better appearance) out weigh the problems. In a cramped engine compartment heat is always an issue and header wrap is an inexpesive solution to a lot of problems. I prefer the black ('cause it just looks cool!) to the white but to each his own.
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 12:22 AM
  #20  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default RE: Headers on a 289

ive got tri-ys the cheapys from npd i think they were 129$ ?? but they dont clear all the steering parts and i have ms they also didnt clear a 65 style top loader pushrod ive got to get the 66 style its adjustable
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
Roxon68
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
17
Mar 17, 2016 08:13 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM
BrantleyS550
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
Sep 14, 2015 04:18 PM
ryland
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
Sep 13, 2015 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.