Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2008, 06:51 PM
  #1  
interwest
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
interwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 78
Default 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

My friend just bought two 302 h.o. motors that came out of 93 fox bodies. He's keeping one and selling me the other one if I want to put it in my '66.
If I do switch I want to stay carbed because I just bought a new holley. Anyone know the power difference between the 302 ho and 289? Keep the stock 289 or swap with the 302 ho? Thanks
interwest is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:01 PM
  #2  
PJC Racing
3rd Gear Member
 
PJC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 836
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

Your 289 block is much stronger than a newer 302, it can alsobe stroked out to a 347 and can accommodate a roller cam (just make sure you use a full base circle cam and link bar lifters, not those reto fit kits).

You could drop the 302 in stockwhile youbuild a real nice stroker out of the 289, that's what I would do anyway.
PJC Racing is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:06 PM
  #3  
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,115
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

how is the stock 289 stronger then aroller 302 w/ forged internals? i thought it was the other way around, im not saying your wrong, im just askin

when i did the swap there was so much difference, it was like night n day. ive also found the 5.0 redlines higher
Mustangdemon67 is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:09 PM
  #4  
TripleHmotosports
1st Gear Member
 
TripleHmotosports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 109
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

The Block is Better.
TripleHmotosports is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:10 PM
  #5  
interwest
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
interwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 78
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

well the 302 I can get is a roller. Online I'm seeing the stock 302 from 93 putting out about 200 hp, is that accurate?
interwest is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:15 PM
  #6  
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,115
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

maybe, but im guessin that for EFI.i did the swap but from a 90 fox, and im very happy with it. so i guess its what you want to do
Mustangdemon67 is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:17 PM
  #7  
Mustangdemon67
4th Gear Member
 
Mustangdemon67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,115
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

ORIGINAL: TripleHmotosports

The Block is Better.
both are windsor blocks though arnt they?
Mustangdemon67 is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:26 PM
  #8  
JohnnyK
2nd Gear Member
 
JohnnyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 303
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

93HO block is a superior engine. ALthough it's not the ideal year. I believe in 91 or 92 they switched from forged..
JohnnyK is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:28 PM
  #9  
PJC Racing
3rd Gear Member
 
PJC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 836
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

The 289 has much thicker webbing and mains whick makes it stronger. The 289 is a much strong block than the new 302 period. The only advantages the new 302 (block)has over the 289 is a one piece main seal and it will be cheaper to run a roller cam (as said before you can use a roller cam in the 289)As for the 200hp, you can makeyour stock shortblock do that easily.
PJC Racing is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:28 PM
  #10  
interwest
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
interwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 78
Default RE: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?

Staying carbed a good idea?

Is 500 bucks reasonable for the block?
interwest is offline  


Quick Reply: 289 to 302 H.O. yes? no?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.