Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

8" verses 9"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #11  
davesanborn's Avatar
davesanborn
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 593
From:
Default RE: 8" verses 9"

Although I never checked myself, I read somewhere recently that the 9" when compared to the 8" is roughly 90 pounds heavier.

Either way, this is not a good area to shed weight. Keep the 9".

Getting the car under 2500 pounds is easier than you think.

Remove:

radio/speakers
back seat
front passenger seat
heater box/controls/blower motor

Convert to:

a 4 link rear suspension (removing the leaf springs)
Aluminum heads
Aluminum block
Aluminum radiator
Aluminum intake
Aluminum wheels
FG hood
FG aprons
FG fenders

It all depends on what your goals are and how much money you want to spend, but swapping a 9" for an 8" usually isn't one of the considerations.

Dave
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #12  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default RE: 8" verses 9"

If you never drag race, never launch hard coming off a stop light, never bang gears to hear the "chirp", and never run any tire that's grippier than a street-only summer performance tire, you can probably get it to live a fairly long life. One of my other cars is an EFI 355 with350-ish to maybe 375 HP & torque(flywheel) driving through a Tremec 3550 and a GM 7.5/7.625 axle. The diff and gears have held up just fine, but the preload in the Auburn Pro posi has not fared nearly as well.

But I suspect that those are some mighty big "ifs" for most folks here, especially those with 400 HP or better. Keep the 9, or maybe consider an 8.8 if anybody builds one to fit.


Norm
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #13  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default RE: 8" verses 9"

Actually, the weak point in the 8" is the two-pinion differential, not the axles.

If you drive casually, I doubt you'd destroy a four-pinion 8". But I bet some hard launches would bring it right to it's limit. I wouldn't put an 8" behind that torquey of a motor. If you're hell bent on saving weight (yes, the 9" is much heavier than an 8"), go to an 8.8" rear. Lighter, but still stronger than an 8". I still don't think it's worth the time, money, and effort unless you're track racing it, but it's your car
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #14  
tyler72's Avatar
tyler72
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 971
From: Apison, TN
Default RE: 8" verses 9"

Yeah, I wasn't saying trade for an 8. By all means, keep the 9 inch. I am changing my carrier out, and putting in a Detroit True-Trac, so I will therefore be making the rear stronger. I think with this mod, I won't have any problems.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Js04sILVerBullet
Street/Strip
12
May 9, 2007 06:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.