Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Compression ratio question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #21  
67coupe's Avatar
67coupe
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 349
From:
Default RE: Compression ratio question.

I have used that octane booster added to a tank of regular many times, but after I finally thought about the price of the booster vs just buying high test gas I decided there was no savings. I guess if you had higher than 11:1 you could add it to high test and be ok. It does work.
Old May 1, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #22  
Magiarn71's Avatar
Magiarn71
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 646
From:
Default RE: Compression ratio question.

Octane booster is CRAP. It says it raises the octane by as much as 4 points. It's true, it does: Four POINTS as in .4 , that to me is a complete waste of $ and it wont make that much difference. There's no way you were adding a three dollar bottle of stuff and going from 87 to 93.....If that was the case, they wouldn't be able to keep it on the shelves.
Old May 1, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #23  
69mach1377's Avatar
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,593
From: ABQ, NM, USA
Default RE: Compression ratio question.

Flat tops or pop ups will increase your ratio, but may hinder complete burn of your mixture. One manufacturer sells dished ones specifically for that reason, Kieth Black Silvolite...check out their write up on this.
Old May 1, 2005 | 01:47 PM
  #24  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
Thread Starter
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: Compression ratio question.


ORIGINAL: Magiarn71

Octane booster is CRAP. It says it raises the octane by as much as 4 points. It's true, it does: Four POINTS as in .4 , that to me is a complete waste of $ and it wont make that much difference. There's no way you were adding a three dollar bottle of stuff and going from 87 to 93.....If that was the case, they wouldn't be able to keep it on the shelves.
So, it is snake oil like most additives, huh? I have never been a believer in additives except lead additives to the gas for my old soft valved seats to keep them from burning. I know a lot of guys who say that just buying 93 octane gas will take care of that, but 93 octane gas doesn't replace the leaded gas that used to be used in my original 289. By studying lead additives, I found that a very small amount of NCA is introduced to the gas to cushion the soft valve seats. Whether or not is actually does or not, I am taking no chances. I use the highest octane gas I can buy plus the lead additive. So there.....I've made up my mind, and I'm sticking to it.
Old May 3, 2005 | 10:40 AM
  #25  
horseshoeing's Avatar
horseshoeing
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 590
From:
Default RE: Compression ratio question.

Lead made the octane go up. I don't know how, but it did. Just something I seen on TV.
Old May 7, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #26  
73Cleveland's Avatar
73Cleveland
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 375
From:
Default RE: Compression ratio question.

Didn't the lead slow the burn of the gas? I think as you said the lead by itself boosted the octane rating.
Old May 7, 2005 | 02:04 AM
  #27  
67coupe's Avatar
67coupe
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 349
From:
Default RE: Compression ratio question.

Higher octane gas does burn slower than lower octane. The higher octane fuel is more stable so it can be compressed to a higher pressure where as a lower octane might ignite just from the pressure.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
Oct 1, 2015 08:31 PM
bconboy
2005-2014 Mustangs
16
Sep 21, 2015 12:52 PM
uberstang1
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
6
Sep 20, 2015 06:42 PM
Daddys Girls GTs
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Sep 14, 2015 08:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 AM.