Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

New Member

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #21  
vescotech's Avatar
vescotech
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 116
From: nc
Default

Yes I have ran it and as soon as I get it back from the paint shop it will go to the dyno. As far as why the 4.6 and not a 5.0. I've owned a few early mustangs and didn't like the way the drove. I wanted to replace the front suspension with the mustang 2 style to see how it would drive. After cutting the shock towers out the engine bay was so large the 5.0 looked to small. After working with the 4.6 I've come to like it very much. Its all aluminum and has 4 bolt mains with cross bolts through the block as well. It also has a forged crank and forged pistons. Mine has a set of Manley h beam steel rods in case I want to spray it later. Thanks again for the complaments it was a lot of work but I think it turned out ok.
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #22  
1965fastback's Avatar
1965fastback
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 790
From: Arkansas
Default

It turned out better than ok, it turned out great! Keep the good work up!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coyote_hpr
New Member Area
14
Nov 12, 2019 12:44 PM
rgingo
Forum Issues and Feedback
3
Oct 21, 2015 12:49 PM
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Oct 16, 2015 08:13 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
Oct 5, 2015 07:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.