Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Engine upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
SJs 66coupe's Avatar
SJs 66coupe
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,019
From: Houston, Texas
Default Engine upgrades

I am starting to save money and look for parts to beef up the engine a bit.

Found a buddy that has a Edlebrock 600cfm (#1406) that he is looking to part ways with that has had little use.

Would this work on a pretty much stock 289, obviously would need to change the intake but would if fly for now till I get heads, etc?

I was even kicking around buying the parts now as I can find deals on them and then at some later date putting it all on at once but that makes any problems that come up more difficult to pin point I suppose.
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #2  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default

yeah a 600 will be fine on a stock 289, though i would highly recommend a holley design over an edelbrock.

actually i have an extra holley 600 that was on a motor less than a month and looks / functions like new - looking to get 200 bucks for it and a 14" round chrome holley air cleaner if your interested
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 02:44 AM
  #3  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

I need to copy an opposing argument to my77's usual '600CFM is great for a stock 289/302' post.

The factory autolite 4V carb is (optimistically) rated at 480CFM and is absolutely perfect for a stock 289. If you plan on mild upgrades in the future, I'd recommend a 500CFM Edelbrock. Your 289 will never come close to pulling 600CFM, and overcarbing is only going to sacrifice throttle response and efficiency. Yes, a 600CFM Holley may get you 5 more hp on a dyno at wide open throttle, but a 500CFM edelbrock will be easier to tune, get better throttle response (meaning better driveability) and fuel efficiency, require less maintenance, and still perform just fine on the street compared to a 600CFM Holley.
Old Dec 23, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #4  
coda618's Avatar
coda618
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 622
From:
Default

+1 on the 480cfm. I just rebuilt my engine with a decent sized cam and I am still using my Autlite 4100 (480cfm). IMO 600cfm too much for a stock engine.
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 02:36 AM
  #5  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default

The above sounds good. You need to ask yourself what your overall plan will be. You may want to look up top end kits from summit and jegs. I bough carb, cam, intake, valve springs and retainers, and gaskets for $849. It was a smokin deal. It was all great stuff too.
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 03:46 AM
  #6  
68dustin's Avatar
68dustin
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
From: cali
Default

best bang for the buck...................gears...................
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #7  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default

he bought my holley

SJ, when you install it PLEASE find this thread and report back with your "*** dyno" power increases to shut these 480 cfm people up once and for all.


Old Dec 24, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #8  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

you're just about the only one touting 600CFM carbs for stock 289's. And anything he posts will be useless unless he follows up by dumping an Autolite 4100 or 500CFM carb on it immediately afterwards. I have a 600CFM carb set up perfectly on my 320hp 331; the same carb is not going to work as well on a 170hp 289. There is no reason to overcarb that much.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Granatelli Sales
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
22
Jan 20, 2020 12:34 AM
Nick Oliver
V6 S197 General Discussion
6
Oct 17, 2018 04:22 AM
Pyrate Dave
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
8
Sep 10, 2015 07:30 PM
mdj89
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
2
Sep 6, 2015 11:08 PM
zachary1988
4.6L General Discussion
5
Sep 4, 2015 03:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.