Help 289 = 302
#13
289 (4.00 bore 2.87 stroke)
302 (4.00 bore 3.00 stroke)
I can argue both sides of which is better. From a torque perspective, the 302 is going to be slightly better due to having more stroke. From a horsepower perspective, you can rev the 289 higher with the right parts because it has less piston speed limitation due to having a shorter stroke. All things equal, the 289s horsepower will be at a little higher rpm than the 302. Remember horsepower is a function of torque AND rpm. If the torque numbers are not too different, you can sometime compensate for lack of torque by reving higher.
my77stang is right, tell us how much money you got and what you want your pony to do and we can help spend it for you.
302 (4.00 bore 3.00 stroke)
I can argue both sides of which is better. From a torque perspective, the 302 is going to be slightly better due to having more stroke. From a horsepower perspective, you can rev the 289 higher with the right parts because it has less piston speed limitation due to having a shorter stroke. All things equal, the 289s horsepower will be at a little higher rpm than the 302. Remember horsepower is a function of torque AND rpm. If the torque numbers are not too different, you can sometime compensate for lack of torque by reving higher.
my77stang is right, tell us how much money you got and what you want your pony to do and we can help spend it for you.
Last edited by urban_cowboy; 02-10-2009 at 10:57 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
jaiidutch
Motor Swap Section
2
09-14-2015 10:29 AM