Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Flowmaster questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #21  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Originally Posted by tx65coupe
Thats interesting, but wouldn't 2 300-400 cfm mufflers be adequate for most cars running 500-750 cfm carbs? Thats my thought.

If the regular 40 flows enough for big block setups then on our Mustangs I don't think the ones that flow more cfm would really make any difference in performance.
It's not just about pure flow rates, but also about exhaust turbulence. Flowmasters are basically the worst type of performance mufflers as far as exhaust turbulence goes. Compare the internal design of my Hushpower II's (basically two perforated cones) or a set of Magnaflows or Dynomaxes (straight-through perforated tube with fiberglass packing) to the design of a chambered Flowmaster.

No, you're probably not going to notice a difference (especially if you have stock 289/302 exhaust ports), but I'd like to think every bit helps.
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #22  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

I don't see how Flowmaster creates turbulence from the diagrams I have seen of them. To me the perforated baffles seems to me like it is going to create much more turbulence that the traingle baffle in the Flowmaster. Doesn't Flowmaster make Hushpower II?
Old Aug 1, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #23  
Duba's Avatar
Duba
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 42
From: California
Default

It all sounds great, you guys, but keep in mind I am asking about mufflers for a 1967 mustang coupe with dual exhaust!!!
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 12:49 AM
  #24  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

You never said how loud you wanted it to be? Are you looking for mild V8 sound or loud etc?
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #25  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Originally Posted by tx65coupe
I don't see how Flowmaster creates turbulence from the diagrams I have seen of them. To me the perforated baffles seems to me like it is going to create much more turbulence that the traingle baffle in the Flowmaster. Doesn't Flowmaster make Hushpower II?
Yes, Flowmaster owns Hushpower, but they're an entire different division than the normal Flowmaster muffler line. Hushpowers were computer designed using some really complicated thermo and fluid dynamic concepts that decrease unwanted sound (especially any droning) and increase exhaust flow rates. Some of the race mufflers actually flow better than straight pipe.

Go here for more details.

Standard chambered Flowmasters were designed purely for sound. They flow terrible. If you run exhaust gas into a wall, it's going to back up. It'll go around eventually, but it creates all sorts of turbulence in the exhaust stream.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #26  
Cpt.Morgan's Avatar
Cpt.Morgan
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
From: Arizona
Default

What do you guys think of the JBA side exhaust kit?

We are getting close to ordering a new exhaust and im split between spintech and JBA.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #27  
Duba's Avatar
Duba
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 42
From: California
Default

TX65coupe--

Would like something loud but it concerns me that there is "droning" inside some of the items discussed. What do you think about the hushpower and what do you think about the flowmaster super 40.

Some guys think that the flowmaster does not present itself well and does nothing to upgrade the power/in relation to the Doug Thorley headers I will have in it.

I hesitate just because I want to do this right and put in the correct thing once.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #28  
restomod@16's Avatar
restomod@16
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 381
From: SJ, CA
Default

check the manufacturers website they typically have sound/video clips of the exhaust system. I've got the FLowmaster Super 44's and they can definately drone @ cruising rpms. I still love them tho. I dont cruise much so it doesnt affect me, plus im 18 so i can hear it all. I love the aggressive tone to the flowmasters but if you're looking for a system thats still respectable in both tone and quality I would say go with magnaflows. Just my .02
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #29  
xIE X T A C Yx's Avatar
xIE X T A C Yx
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 32
From: California
Default

Wow i was in the same situation myself, haha FM 40s for me.
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 06:18 PM
  #30  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Duba
TX65coupe--

Would like something loud but it concerns me that there is "droning" inside some of the items discussed. What do you think about the hushpower and what do you think about the flowmaster super 40.

Some guys think that the flowmaster does not present itself well and does nothing to upgrade the power/in relation to the Doug Thorley headers I will have in it.

I hesitate just because I want to do this right and put in the correct thing once.
The Hushpowers are expensive. Keep that in mind if you're considering them. I absolutely love mine, but they're pricey.

My setup (331 stroker, full length headers, 2-1/4" pipe, H-pipe, 2-1/2" Hushpower II's, full tail pipes) resonates very slightly inside the cab at about 2k rpm under load. I don't really spend any time at that rpm, so it doesn't bother me. With better sound insulation, it wouldn't be there at all. As is, it's still a lot better than most cars I've been in with 40-series mufflers. And side by side with any chambered muffler, I'd choose the Hushpowers any day. More even tone, less raspiness, and an absolutely wicked sound at WOT all the way to 6k+.

Poke around on youtube and find recordings of classic mustangs with different mufflers. I'm sure you'll find something you like.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.