Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Question about an LTD 302 HO Police package transplant into a 66

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #1  
scootchu's Avatar
scootchu
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,110
From: NJ
Default Question about an LTD 302 HO Police package transplant into a 66

My neighbor has a thing for car auctions and being that he works for the city has aquired quite a few. He offered to pull the engine out of a 1985 LTD with the police packaged 302 HO. I just took a look also at the rear and couldn't identify it since the car has flats an the gas tank blocked my view. The third member looked like it had a unusually long carrrier on it.

Soooooooooo first, does anyone know how wide a rear was on the 85 LTDs? I just did a quick measurement from outside wheel to outside wheel and it was in the neighborhood of 65". I did seem in the ballpark for a swap in a 1966, provided it had a better gear ratio and perhaps a locker.

Second, were the HO 302 engines any different in the block used, 4 bolt? I don't think from everything I have read, but wasn't positive.

Finally is it even worth considering yanking that engine without even knowing what the condition of the block, heads and everything else is?
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #2  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default

the motor isnt anything special and is a non roller and no 302 had 4bolt main except for boss 302 blocks and aftermarket. iirc the LTD in that year range is a fox bodied car so it would be a weak 7.5 inch rear or maybe the beefier 8.8(doubtful as the mustang didnt get the 8.8 till 1986)
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Agreed. Not really valuable as a donor. Even if the rear is an 8.8, it's going to be wider than your '66
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 02:22 PM
  #4  
scootchu's Avatar
scootchu
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,110
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by rmodel65
the motor isnt anything special and is a non roller and no 302 had 4bolt main except for boss 302 blocks and aftermarket. iirc the LTD in that year range is a fox bodied car so it would be a weak 7.5 inch rear or maybe the beefier 8.8(doubtful as the mustang didnt get the 8.8 till 1986)

What year did they get a 302 roller? If they did at all.
According to this website they came along in 85.
http://phystutor.tripod.com/stang/engines/50.html

Last edited by scootchu; Aug 23, 2009 at 02:24 PM.
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 02:54 PM
  #5  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default

Originally Posted by scootchu
What year did they get a 302 roller? If they did at all.
According to this website they came along in 85.
http://phystutor.tripod.com/stang/engines/50.html

the mustang got a roller in 85 idk that any other non mustangs did other than the lincoln mark 7

pull the intake and see if it had the dog bone to hold the lifters in place
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #6  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Ya know, now that I think about it, '85 was the first year roller for HO motors (assuming the lincoln came with an HO, which I'm not sure about). Not the greatest bottom end (pistons are cast flat-tops, iirc), but I suppose it would work as a donor block for a build. I wouldn't pay much for it, though.

Last edited by Starfury; Aug 23, 2009 at 02:59 PM.
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #7  
scootchu's Avatar
scootchu
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,110
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Starfury
Ya know, now that I think about it, '85 was the first year roller for HO motors (assuming the lincoln came with an HO, which I'm not sure about). Not the greatest bottom end (pistons are cast flat-tops, iirc), but I suppose it would work as a donor block for a build. I wouldn't pay much for it, though.
He offered to yank it out and throw it over the fence. LOL
He also has a 302 in a 4 door Maverick.
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #8  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Oh, well in that case Take the motor and use it for a good roller build.
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
rmodel65's Avatar
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,812
From: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Default

Originally Posted by Starfury
Ya know, now that I think about it, '85 was the first year roller for HO motors (assuming the lincoln came with an HO, which I'm not sure about). Not the greatest bottom end (pistons are cast flat-tops, iirc), but I suppose it would work as a donor block for a build. I wouldn't pay much for it, though.

the mark 7 got the 5.0 ho same as the mustang intake cam etc all the same except the lincoln had a 100amp alternator
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
Apr 29, 2019 02:56 PM
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
Jan 6, 2016 08:22 PM
mungodrums
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
Oct 7, 2015 04:01 AM
robjh22
Suspension
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:47 PM
mungodrums
Suspension
0
Sep 7, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.