Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Question about an LTD 302 HO Police package transplant into a 66

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2009, 01:26 PM
  #1  
scootchu
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
scootchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,110
Default Question about an LTD 302 HO Police package transplant into a 66

My neighbor has a thing for car auctions and being that he works for the city has aquired quite a few. He offered to pull the engine out of a 1985 LTD with the police packaged 302 HO. I just took a look also at the rear and couldn't identify it since the car has flats an the gas tank blocked my view. The third member looked like it had a unusually long carrrier on it.

Soooooooooo first, does anyone know how wide a rear was on the 85 LTDs? I just did a quick measurement from outside wheel to outside wheel and it was in the neighborhood of 65". I did seem in the ballpark for a swap in a 1966, provided it had a better gear ratio and perhaps a locker.

Second, were the HO 302 engines any different in the block used, 4 bolt? I don't think from everything I have read, but wasn't positive.

Finally is it even worth considering yanking that engine without even knowing what the condition of the block, heads and everything else is?
scootchu is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 01:31 PM
  #2  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

the motor isnt anything special and is a non roller and no 302 had 4bolt main except for boss 302 blocks and aftermarket. iirc the LTD in that year range is a fox bodied car so it would be a weak 7.5 inch rear or maybe the beefier 8.8(doubtful as the mustang didnt get the 8.8 till 1986)
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 01:52 PM
  #3  
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Starfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 5,896
Default

Agreed. Not really valuable as a donor. Even if the rear is an 8.8, it's going to be wider than your '66
Starfury is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 02:22 PM
  #4  
scootchu
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
scootchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,110
Default

Originally Posted by rmodel65
the motor isnt anything special and is a non roller and no 302 had 4bolt main except for boss 302 blocks and aftermarket. iirc the LTD in that year range is a fox bodied car so it would be a weak 7.5 inch rear or maybe the beefier 8.8(doubtful as the mustang didnt get the 8.8 till 1986)

What year did they get a 302 roller? If they did at all.
According to this website they came along in 85.
http://phystutor.tripod.com/stang/engines/50.html

Last edited by scootchu; 08-23-2009 at 02:24 PM.
scootchu is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 02:54 PM
  #5  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

Originally Posted by scootchu
What year did they get a 302 roller? If they did at all.
According to this website they came along in 85.
http://phystutor.tripod.com/stang/engines/50.html

the mustang got a roller in 85 idk that any other non mustangs did other than the lincoln mark 7

pull the intake and see if it had the dog bone to hold the lifters in place
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 02:55 PM
  #6  
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Starfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 5,896
Default

Ya know, now that I think about it, '85 was the first year roller for HO motors (assuming the lincoln came with an HO, which I'm not sure about). Not the greatest bottom end (pistons are cast flat-tops, iirc), but I suppose it would work as a donor block for a build. I wouldn't pay much for it, though.

Last edited by Starfury; 08-23-2009 at 02:59 PM.
Starfury is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 03:13 PM
  #7  
scootchu
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
scootchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,110
Default

Originally Posted by Starfury
Ya know, now that I think about it, '85 was the first year roller for HO motors (assuming the lincoln came with an HO, which I'm not sure about). Not the greatest bottom end (pistons are cast flat-tops, iirc), but I suppose it would work as a donor block for a build. I wouldn't pay much for it, though.
He offered to yank it out and throw it over the fence. LOL
He also has a 302 in a 4 door Maverick.
scootchu is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 03:21 PM
  #8  
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Starfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 5,896
Default

Oh, well in that case Take the motor and use it for a good roller build.
Starfury is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 03:37 PM
  #9  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

Originally Posted by Starfury
Ya know, now that I think about it, '85 was the first year roller for HO motors (assuming the lincoln came with an HO, which I'm not sure about). Not the greatest bottom end (pistons are cast flat-tops, iirc), but I suppose it would work as a donor block for a build. I wouldn't pay much for it, though.

the mark 7 got the 5.0 ho same as the mustang intake cam etc all the same except the lincoln had a 100amp alternator
rmodel65 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
04-29-2019 02:56 PM
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
mungodrums
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
10-07-2015 04:01 AM
robjh22
Suspension
0
09-08-2015 12:47 PM
mungodrums
Suspension
0
09-07-2015 07:28 PM



Quick Reply: Question about an LTD 302 HO Police package transplant into a 66



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.