Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

64.5 sleeper mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #11  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by tx65coupe
I think we have touched on this before, but I don't see how it can get 30 mpg. When mine was still a 200 3 speed and everything mechanical was rebuilt or new the best it got was 20.
Well, I have personally got 21 mpg (highway) in my A code 289 4V 4-sp fastback, so I don't know what you did to get only 20. My 66 200/C4 convertible got 25 mpg on the highway. I had a 66 200/3sp, but never checked the mileage.
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #12  
THUMPIN455's Avatar
THUMPIN455
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,566
From: Marquette Mi
Default

I never checked mileage on the 67. I wonder what it will get now with the Cleveland in it and 3.00 gears. One thing is for sure though, it wont use much gasoline and if I can achieve it, it wont burn anymore gasoline as long as I own it. I should build an AOD for it, that would make a fun cruiser.

Back to the O.P. its better to get a V8 car, but you can still do the upgrades, if you shop around a bit it wont be that bad. No need for a 9" rear, an 8" will do fine. Some Granada spindles will give you disc brakes and five lugs, if you can find Granada spindles. A radiator is a good upgrade anyway and its always advisable to add torque boxes to the side that doesnt have one. Do most of the work and hunting of parts yourself and its far cheaper than having a shop do the labor and legwork for you.

All is not lost, but why not rebuild the I6 and have a nice cruiser, then pick up another V8 car cheap? You can get Cougars real cheap and ALL of them from 67-74 had V8s in them. Its something different and still a classic Ford. Even though they are somewhat rare, they dont cost an arm and a leg to buy.
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #13  
64.5stanger's Avatar
64.5stanger
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 233
From: minnesota
Default

thanx guys, specialy 4 the confidence. I Can do it! (might take a few hundred posts)
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #14  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by 64.5stanger
thanx guys, specialy 4 the confidence. I Can do it! (might take a few hundred posts)
True! Get the Factory Service Manual, and turn it into a nice cruiser. These cars are really easy to work on, when you have the right book and a little advice from time to time.
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #15  
1slow67's Avatar
1slow67
ROTM Moderator
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,157
From: AL
Default

With my old setup (200 1bbl w/3 speed, 3.20 rear gears) I averaged 25 mpg.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #16  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 2+2GT
Well, I have personally got 21 mpg (highway) in my A code 289 4V 4-sp fastback, so I don't know what you did to get only 20. My 66 200/C4 convertible got 25 mpg on the highway. I had a 66 200/3sp, but never checked the mileage.
The 302 in the 65 is not stock and its also has some fun with mild hot rodding and I get about 20 mpg average.

I find it hard to believe that any of those cars got that good. I have never seen a 289 Mustang with 3 speed or C4 get more than about 16 or so mpg. My Dad said that the 60 Falcon they had did not even get 20 mpg and it was a 170. He also said that hardly any car got more than 20 mpg. These are city highway mix or average.

I don't know what my 65 gets highway only. I haven't had the chance to figure it yet.

Last edited by tx65coupe; Oct 21, 2009 at 01:32 AM.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 01:30 AM
  #17  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by BA Mustang
With my old setup (200 1bbl w/3 speed, 3.20 rear gears) I averaged 25 mpg.
Thats the exact setup my car originally had. It never got more than about 20.

Last edited by tx65coupe; Oct 21, 2009 at 01:34 AM.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 01:32 AM
  #18  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

For the original poster. I agree with what was said earlier about it being rewarding to do an I6 to V8 conversion. I would say that it definitely was a rewarding project. I would do it again.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 01:33 AM
  #19  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 2+2GT
True! Get the Factory Service Manual, and turn it into a nice cruiser. These cars are really easy to work on, when you have the right book and a little advice from time to time.
+1 on this statement.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 10:29 AM
TimeLord101
New Member Area
2
Oct 1, 2015 06:40 AM
firecoyote
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
28
Sep 27, 2015 02:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.