Headers vs. Manifolds
Performance, yes. Quality, no. There's a difference between hooker comps and FPA's or Doug's or JBA's. Thicker flanges, thicker tubing, better welds, better finish, better fit. These are the things you're paying for. I've seen pics of full-length FPA's that tuck up so well that they sit above the frame rails.
Exactly. Thats why I got the JBA headers. They are stainless, and the flange is thicker as well as the gauge of the tubing. My JBAs were about 400 or so if I remember right.
If you have a bunch of extra cash, the FPA headers probably would be the best way to go. I doubt most people have that much to spend on headers though.
If you have a bunch of extra cash, the FPA headers probably would be the best way to go. I doubt most people have that much to spend on headers though.
To the OP, do you run power or manual steering? We tried to use the Tri-Y's with our '66 289 with power steering, and they don't fit. There is a steering relocation kit to help, but it lowers the slave cylinder closer to the ground, and in our car's case, things still didn't fit. We went with a set of MAC ceramic coated longtubes (For a 86-93 Mustang) that run about $360 and they have worked quite nicely. We've had them on for 4 years and have had no leakage issues and the ceramic coating has held up reasonably well. The only downside is that I can't run a clutch cable conversion kit with these headers because one of the tubes goes in front of the cable mounting hole in the bellhousing.
Here's a shot of them installed:
Here's a shot of them installed:
Last edited by JDraper; Nov 21, 2009 at 08:12 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM




