Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Engine overhaul?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #11  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by NuclearMuscle523
Not much of a lip, but i do have a reamer, and I was going to hone out any minor stuff, but get a hot dip first. And this engine is going to be super duper stock expect for a nice sounding cam.
Look seriously at the small hydraulic roller grinds. Two-teens intake duration at 0.050" valve lift is enough to give your car some voice, will drive around town not much differently than stock, and will have more up top than a flat-tappet cam of similar specs. One other thing - with a HR cam you can pretty much not worry about finding oil with enough ZDDP in it.

I've got a small HR cam in a moderately built 355 SBC in one of my other cars (there's a picture in one of my albums), and I'd never go back to a flat-tappet cam.


Norm
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #12  
MBDiagMan's Avatar
MBDiagMan
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 886
From: North East Texas on the Red River
Default

Yes there are many advantages to a Hydraulic Roller cam as long as your budget can stand it. Horsepower or torque per dollar will not justify one, but if your budget can stand it, the lowering of friction and oil temperature and the lack of oil considerations that come along with a flat tappet cam are attractive.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #13  
Shimrra's Avatar
Shimrra
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 47
From: CT
Default

only advice i really have is toss that ridge reamer in the trash where is belongs!
that is just as bad as lapping a valve!

ask yourself why you use a ridge reamer...
because the old rings get caught? if the ridge is that bad, you don't think you need to bore it?
why are you trying to save the old rings? you should replace them anyways, who cares if they break on the way out?
a ring compressor and lube will be fine to get new rings in without a reamer, so why use it?
the cylinder has bias wear to it and the ride is the only part that is left "true" so do you think the reamer will run a perfect circle when one side is twice as thick?
a boring bar at a shop is centered via the top of the cylinder to make it true, now it can be done other ways but they are allot more effort, so why make a simply job like cleaning .030 out of a block into a bigger job?
last but not least, a headgaset is meant to sit right on the EDGE of the bore, so if you open it up a little too much, now you expose more of the gasket than intended and can lead to issues later on.


as for a hyd roller, i agree with MBD, if you can afford one, do it. they are nice as long as you keep clean oil (NOT QUAKERSTATE that **** is CRAP)

and if you re-use the heads and valves, it is a good idea to have them magnafluxed, and then have the seats cut. make sure the place that cut them doesn't have something like a "normal valve job" and a "race: 3 angle"
some places are shady and will try to get by with less work. 3 angles it the min, if they say less, grab your **** and RUN. another good thing to ask is if they use an interference angel when they cut seats and valves. if they say yes, your in the right spot. an interference valve job is pretty much the best you can do. you can also have the valves back cut for better flow usually.

Last edited by Shimrra; Feb 1, 2010 at 03:17 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
21
Apr 4, 2020 02:16 PM
Nick Oliver
V6 S197 General Discussion
6
Oct 17, 2018 04:22 AM
AmericanMuscle4.6GT
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
Nov 10, 2015 02:06 PM
rksnow1
Motor Swap Section
0
Sep 14, 2015 08:46 PM
Pyrate Dave
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
8
Sep 10, 2015 07:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.