Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

351c Exhaust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 10:49 PM
  #1  
71Mach14spd's Avatar
71Mach14spd
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
From: California
Default 351c Exhaust?

I'm getting closer to choose my exhaust set up for the Mach 1. I am thinking of going with 2.25 or 2.5 exhaust with a custom X pipe and 2 Super 44's. Has anyone run this or a similar set up with a 351C? Just curious to hear the good and bad reviews and maybe even a sound clip if possible. Thanks in advance for help/opinions.

-Tim
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 02:00 AM
  #2  
Aussie66Fastback's Avatar
Aussie66Fastback
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,266
From: Australia
Default

is your 351 modded?
to what extent?

smaller pipe gives a higher velocity flow of exhaust gases = crisper sound. 2.25 will be cheaper and easier to fit and sufficient up to say 400hp (there will be arguments about the actual hp amount but thats been my experience).

so, for mine, mild street motor gets the smaller pipes. but... if you have plans for significant amounts of hp, 2.5 will be a better option.
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #3  
imnutz66's Avatar
imnutz66
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 63
From:
Default

2.25 for me - they say slightly more off the line low end, plus if you are going with factory look tips, I could never find any for 2.5
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
71Mach14spd's Avatar
71Mach14spd
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
From: California
Default

Thanks for the replies.

Yes it is modded, pretty significantly. Around 500 hp to the flywheel.

I also plan on using factory tips if i can, yes.
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #5  
1971mach1's Avatar
1971mach1
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 469
From: The garage (near SF bay- Calif)
Default

Do you have headers? Long tube or shortys?
I got 44s on a mostly stock engine, stock manifold, H-pipe and 2.25". It sounds like a mellow rumble at idle and some drone at speed. Headers would probably drown it out though. If you have headers (most likely if you're at 500hp) it will probably sound alot different. I read that X-pipe sounds different than H-pipe too.
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:08 PM
  #6  
71Mach14spd's Avatar
71Mach14spd
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
From: California
Default

Long tube headers yes, and yeah X and H pipes have totally different sounds.
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:46 AM
  #7  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

I'm glad you decided on factory type tips. That will look great.

I would go with 2.5 inch exhaust since you have close to 500 hp.

I would go with H pipe, it sounds far better than the X. It has a deeper more mellow sound. I'll never have an X pipe on mine. The H is easier to fit as well. The difference in power between H and X is not enought to notice from my experience. I will say this though. Have an exhaust shop make your exhaust system. Most of the prefab stuff fits multiple years and does not fit all that great.

I have to ask though, why Flowmaster? They sound hollow, drone, etc and don't even flow as good as straight through mufflers. I would go with Dynomax Race Bullets or Ultraflo, or Magnaflow. I had dronemaster on mine when I first got it running and could not stand them they resonated so bad.

Last edited by tx65coupe; Jun 16, 2010 at 02:50 AM.
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #8  
pushrodpower's Avatar
pushrodpower
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 241
From:
Default

Originally Posted by 71Mach14spd
I'm getting closer to choose my exhaust set up for the Mach 1. I am thinking of going with 2.25 or 2.5 exhaust with a custom X pipe and 2 Super 44's. Has anyone run this or a similar set up with a 351C? Just curious to hear the good and bad reviews and maybe even a sound clip if possible. Thanks in advance for help/opinions.

-Tim
When I bought my car it was straight pipes (no crossover whatsoever) off of exhaust manifolds and I thought it was loud and obnoxious as hell. After I intalled Hooker long tubes I had a 2.5 inch exhaust with custom x-pipe and dynomax mufflers put on and I liked the sound quite a bit. It was unique with a nice rumble (more or less quiet in the car) with a nice bark when you let off of the throttle. It was not to loud but loud enough.
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 12:49 AM
  #9  
71Mach14spd's Avatar
71Mach14spd
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
From: California
Default

Ok so i think I'm going with the 2.5" since everyone seems to be on the same page with that, and it makes sense. As for going for Flowmasters its just a personal preference, and I've always liked the sound, although I've never heard the super 44's in person. One of the reasons why i was asking. Also i was talking to a buddy of mine today and he said the H pipe IS a better way to go. Its cheaper, does the same thing, and can even sound better. So i am going to go with 2.5" pipe and an H pipe, but i am still undecided on the mufflers. Thanks again for all of the replies guys, appreciate the input.
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 12:50 AM
  #10  
71Mach14spd's Avatar
71Mach14spd
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by pushrodpower
When I bought my car it was straight pipes (no crossover whatsoever) off of exhaust manifolds and I thought it was loud and obnoxious as hell. After I intalled Hooker long tubes I had a 2.5 inch exhaust with custom x-pipe and dynomax mufflers put on and I liked the sound quite a bit. It was unique with a nice rumble (more or less quiet in the car) with a nice bark when you let off of the throttle. It was not to loud but loud enough.
Do you still run this set up? If so, if its not too much trouble, maybe this weekend or something if you have some free time could you get me a video or something of the exhaust. If not no worries, thanks again.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.