Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Strut Rod Bushings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #31  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

Does anyone have any tips or thoughts on replacing the poly with rubber to avoid having to go in for another alignment?
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 12:59 PM
  #32  
paddy187's Avatar
paddy187
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,264
From: Eke, Belgium
Default

the later one includes the strut rod
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 11:58 PM
  #33  
F15Falcon's Avatar
F15Falcon
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 67
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Deviousfred
Uh oh. Not this again. The strut rod does not NEED to become shorter nor should it in theory of this design. This has been beaten to death.

There is no question in my mind that strut rods with rod ends operate far superior than any strut rod with bushings be rubber or poly. They are the bee's knees and anyone who has been on this forum or most other vintage Mustang forums over a month knows this by now. The only issue I have ever had with most aftermarket designs is that they move the strut rod pivot slightly which may not even make a significant difference. So they should be fine.

However, strut rods with rod ends are not Vintage legal to my understanding so there has to be a way to get the most out of bushings to stay Vintage legal. I just don't see a way around it.

Fred
Hey Fred, what if you were to install a tie rod end on the end of the strut rod? It is adjustable, but it is not a rod end, so technically it would be legal. These tie rod ends are used on the wishbones of alot of traditional hot rods to locate the front and rear axles, so they are plenty strong enough.

http://images.speedwaymotors.com/RS/...91645140_T.jpg

Last edited by F15Falcon; Jul 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #34  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

I got the new rubber bushings from Mustangs Unlimited. They say that they are rubber, but I'm just curious if they are or not. They look and feel kinda like poly ones. How hard/stiff are the rubber ones supposed to be?
Old Aug 14, 2010 | 03:02 AM
  #35  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

No one knows a way to tell if what I got is actually rubber? Also, what about replacing them and avoiding having to go to the alignment shop again?
Old Aug 14, 2010 | 06:44 AM
  #36  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Doing your own alignment is certainly possible, once you know how to measure the various angles and have a flat area to set up in. Everything else is wrench work and knowing which things to move a little (there aren't that many). And having the patience to at least double-check every measurement.

No idea concerning the material.


Norm
Old Aug 14, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #37  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by tx65coupe
No one knows a way to tell if what I got is actually rubber? Also, what about replacing them and avoiding having to go to the alignment shop again?
If the wheel alignment was good on a 64-66 and then later the strut bushings were trashed, theoretically you should be able to replace them without aligning. This is because the 64-66 struts are not adjustable, so if you were replacing stock originals with new stock bushings, you'd actually be getting back to correct alignment. Now, if the trashed bushings were "acme auto parts", and the new ones were stock, all bets are off.
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 12:21 AM
  #38  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

The bushings being replaced are not trashed they are just poly urethane. So I guess they won't be the same, so I'll need an alignment again.
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 07:10 AM
  #39  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

They may not be dimensionally identical, but there is another reason for at least checking the alignment when switching bushing material.

Since poly is somewhat stiffer than rubber - this being the usual reason for using it in the first place - poly should be set to slightly different specs than rubber so that the caster and toe while running will still be appropriate (rolling drag and braking will compress the front halves of these bushings slightly, allowing the lower ball joint to move rearward slightly from the statically aligned position). Whether or not this was done when the poly bushings were installed is a separate question, but not knowing whether it was or not is still enough reason to at least check it.


Norm
Old Aug 16, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #40  
tx65coupe's Avatar
tx65coupe
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,462
From: Texas
Default

I had not thought of it that way before. When it was aligned I didn't tell them anything about having poly bushings, so I doubt it was.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
jrrhd73must
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
Oct 2, 2015 09:17 PM
Explosive
Street/Strip
17
Oct 2, 2015 07:45 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:13 AM
mustangheaven
General Tech
2
Sep 29, 2015 11:00 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.