When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OK, then, bear in mind the regular Performer is almost exactly the same performance as a stock cast-iron manifold. Not that there's anything wrong with that, my 289 High Performance engine is now wearing it's original iron manifold, and it's pretty stout.
I don't know about that. I had a Performer 289 for a while and compared it to a stock 4 barrel manifold. The plenum is taller and the runners aren't quite the same. It also doesn't weigh 50lbs:P I wouldn't expect to see any significant difference in the butt-o-meter between the two, but I definitely wouldn't go out and buy a cast iron 4V manifold, even if only for the weight savings.
The RPM manifold is designed for 1500-6500 rpm use. The standard Performer intake is designed for use from off-idle to 5500rpm, where I'd expect a stock engine to be more comfortable.
OK, then, bear in mind the regular Performer is almost exactly the same performance as a stock cast-iron manifold. Not that there's anything wrong with that, my 289 High Performance engine is now wearing it's original iron manifold, and it's pretty stout.
Yes I do understand the difference in power band between the two. I am thinking performer only cause it is stock!