Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

head and top end selection help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default head and top end selection help

I currently have a mid 80s 302 short block that is ready to be finished. I am looking for a a top end set up that will produce about about 375 hp and im sure that should be pretty easy.

Here is the rotating assembly that has been installed
http://www.summitracing.com/search/?...22030%20&dds=1

So as I stand now I am asking for help in choosing my top end parts. I would like to get it all for about $2500 total.

I am not looking for a race engine. Just something I can have fun with. I was thinking about an edelbrock top end kit with rpm heads and an air gap. I think that is the way i am leaning. However, I also need cam, lifters, spider, carb.

Im not looking for a custom ground cam. Im looking for an off the shelf set up that i can put together.

Please send your recommendations. I need this car together and out of the garage.

Thanks
B
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 12:40 AM
  #2  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Not a fan of Edelbrock cams. Their off the shelf cam grinds don't impress me. Call Comp Cams' tech support for an off the shelf cam recommendation based on your specific setup and desires. With the proper valvetrain hardware (matched springs are a must), I think you could get away with a pretty aggressive cam. You do need to know if you want/need a flat tappet or a roller cam.

I have a set of Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads and I really like them. Plenty of valve clearance until you get up into the .540" lift range. That said, Edelbrock Performer RPM's are also supposed to be pretty nice. AFR's flow well, but I've heard a lot about their valvetrain hardware being crap.
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 12:24 PM
  #3  
Jonk67's Avatar
Jonk67
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 678
From: Smyrna, TN
Default

So it is a roller motor then? I don't see any problem with reusing your stealth (port match it to the heads) and 670 carb. Head choice is an opinion preference thing as most HP parts are. I'm with Starfury and haven't been really impressed with the Eddy 'all in one' kits, they seem to be in the middle on comparison tests. Do a search for head comparisons, there have been plenty of Mustang and hotrod magazine articles you can read. For heads I'd look at TFS Twisted Wedge and AFR 165. I went with the 165's for my stroked 333 to avoid piston issues and over sizing with the 185cc and the flow was best for my RPM range and cam grind.

Here's some great charts to look over for flow comparisons:
http://www.carbdford.com/tech/headflow.htm
http://www.carbdford.com/tech/flowdata.htm

As far as cam, plug in all of your car/drivetrain variables and see what top 3 cam grinds are suggested with CompCams free Camquest program, even if you don't buy CC it'll help get the grind you want:
http://camquest.com/
change a few things and see what it does to the grind suggestion. I did this and my engine builder and I came to the same 2 grinds and I chose my preference. Had to be honest with myself that 90% of the time it would be a DD street car and only see 10% track. I was conservative with my cam and went with the XE262, many suggested the 268 (it's habit I guess to always 'go bigger') but I listened to the 268 in a friends 289 and it was too lopey and the vacuum was too low (<15) for my PB and AC, to me.
Jon

Jon

Last edited by Jonk67; Jun 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
mr_velocity's Avatar
mr_velocity
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,027
From: NJ
Default

Not sure why you don't want to go with a custom or semi custom cam, Ed Curtis will set you up for what you have and what you want to do with it. I went with Morrel link bar lifters and Comp pro magnum chromoly rockers to go along with the Ed Curtis cam, heads are Trickflows (170) with a stealth intake and a Holley 4500 from Bigs.

My short block started as a 1990 302HO, I had my shop balance the rotating assembly. Ford did a good job but now it's perfect.
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default

Yes it is a roller block.

Jonk, this is a engine for another car, not the one on my sig.

I have decided on the tfs heads

I am going to go with a air gap intake.

I have a set of magnum roller rockers that i am going to use.

I just have to decide on the cam and lifters.I am going to jump on the CC site now.
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 04:13 PM
  #6  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default

I am leaning toward these heads
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/TFS-51400015/

Here is the intake
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-7521/

Im leaning toward this carb
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/HLY-0-80670/

I just need to get a cam and lifter choice. I will call a few com companies tomorrow
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #7  
mr_velocity's Avatar
mr_velocity
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,027
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MonsterBilly
I am leaning toward these heads
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/TFS-51400015/

Here is the intake
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-7521/

Im leaning toward this carb
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/HLY-0-80670/

I just need to get a cam and lifter choice. I will call a few com companies tomorrow
190cc is way too much intake. Also be aware that many of these heads are not setup for roller cams so you might be doing springs as well.

For lifters you want Morel, they make lifters for many different companies including comp, lunati, crane etc.

Ed Curtis will set you up with the right cam for your combo, whatever it be you choose. He also has good deals on the other parts you're going to need like lifters, pushrods and rockers.

Last edited by mr_velocity; Jun 10, 2012 at 06:34 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 09:19 PM
  #8  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default

So 190 heads on a 347 are too big? What about 185s.

I am running 170s on my 289 so I assumed larger displacement then larger flowing heads.
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 07:56 PM
  #9  
mr_velocity's Avatar
mr_velocity
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,027
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by MonsterBilly
So 190 heads on a 347 are too big? What about 185s.

I am running 170s on my 289 so I assumed larger displacement then larger flowing heads.
Sorry missed the 347 part....for 302 too big but for 347 I have no idea.
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 10:27 PM
  #10  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Depends on how you're going to treat the motor. If you want a daily driver that's going to spend most of its time under 3k rpm, the 170's are going to be a must. If it's a strip car that spends most of its time at WOT, the 190's may be the better way to go. Keep in mind, Ford intake ports aren't all that restrictive (especially when considering TFS heads), and larger ports make for lower charge velocity, which leads to poor throttle response at lower rpm's.

I have the 170cc heads on my aggressively-cammed 331 and I'm perfectly happy with them. I wind my motor up to 6k regularly.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.