Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

66 Export bace install problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 09:23 PM
  #1  
19mike66's Avatar
19mike66
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
From: Kentucky
Default 66 Export bace install problems

I am having some troubles re-installing the export brace on my 66 coupe. I can get only 2 mounting points attached. Either the 2 shock towers bolt up and then the mtg holes on firewall are off by 3/8" or I can get firewall and one shock tower but then other tower mtg holes are off by 3/8-1/2".
I have tried jacking the car on each corner, putting stands under various positions to get the car to flex a bit, but nothing is helping.
My next thought is to put a bottle jack between the towers, parallel to the firewall. Put a 4x4 at either end and apply pressure to force the towers apart. But, it has got to be easier than that......right??
Any suggestions?

thanks
Mike
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 03:02 AM
  #2  
guitarman376's Avatar
guitarman376
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 764
From: California
Default

Sorry I honestly don't know what you should do, but this thread is giving me worries about the export bar I have yet to try installing...
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
Deviousfred's Avatar
Deviousfred
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 630
From: El Paso, TX
Default

I ran into a similar problem. It seems from what you posted that the shock towers need to move away from the firewall. I placed stands under the floor supports just behind the firewall and allowed the car sit like this for several days. When I came back to try again, I had someone stand on the radiator support crossmember. It helped enough to get the bolts in. I had the luxury of this being a project and the front end being disassembled.
Old Aug 6, 2012 | 09:00 AM
  #4  
crunchyskippy's Avatar
crunchyskippy
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 528
From: Northern Virginia
Default

It took me a combination of things to get mine finally on. You're doing the right thing with placing the jack stands on the frame rail behind the front wheels. You'll want to go as far back as (safely) possible from the front wheels to get a leveraging affect. As Fred said, having someone stand on the front - probably the bumper - will have a similar affect.

Lastly, I only started a couple bolts. Then alternating tightening each of them and used a drift to try to start others. It takes time and use patience.

I was unable to use my bottle jack because it wouldn't work on it's side. I suppose repositioning it would work but I couldn't get leverage to jack it then.

Good luck.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:52 AM
  #5  
gjz30075's Avatar
gjz30075
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 290
From:
Default

Mike, you said "re-installing" so I presume it was already on the car. Did you install it the first time, or did you buy the car with it installed? Could be the export brace is incorrectly made. If it's off the car now, get some measurements and compare to another (off the car). This all said, yes, it can be a b*&^h to install.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:06 PM
  #6  
Coupe's Avatar
Coupe
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
From: Indianapolis
Default

Last year I had a chrome one that I got with the car and it would not fit correctly so I ended up moving the holes on the brace and said screw it. This spring I ordered the heavy duty drake unit and it basically dropped in place. Turns out the chrome cheapy was just wrong from the get go.

Just a FYI.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:09 PM
  #7  
RC65's Avatar
RC65
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 63
From: Nebraska
Default

I did the Scott Drake heavy brace also, installed with ease!
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:51 AM
  #8  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Coupe
Last year I had a chrome one that I got with the car and it would not fit correctly so I ended up moving the holes on the brace and said screw it. This spring I ordered the heavy duty drake unit and it basically dropped in place. Turns out the chrome cheapy was just wrong from the get go.
This has been my experience. The cheaper braces, which probably have half the strength, are not quite right dimensionally. The excellent Drake brace is maybe $15 more than the cheap ones.
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #9  
crunchyskippy's Avatar
crunchyskippy
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 528
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by 2+2GT
The cheaper braces, which probably have half the strength, are not quite right dimensionally.
While I agree about the dimensional correctness of the cheaper brace, I have to question the comment on being half as strong. How exactly are you measuring the tensile and compressional strength of an export brace?
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 06:26 PM
  #10  
Deviousfred's Avatar
Deviousfred
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 630
From: El Paso, TX
Default

Originally Posted by crunchyskippy
While I agree about the dimensional correctness of the cheaper brace, I have to question the comment on being half as strong. How exactly are you measuring the tensile and compressional strength of an export brace?
I would be hesitant to put a numerical value on how many time stronger the Scott Drake unit is over the cheaper ones, but there is no doubt about it that it is stronger. The sheet metal used on the Drake unit is substantially thicker.

Fred



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.