Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

'66 hybrid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #1  
66hrdtcoupe's Avatar
66hrdtcoupe
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 21
From: Indiana
Default '66 hybrid?

I recently started restoring a 1966 mustang all numbers matching car for my daughter but i also recently came up with the idea to turn it into a hybrid. I don't know jack about hybrid motors but how hard could it be to put one in an old car? upgrade the frame, suspension, rear end, breaks, motor, and transmission. Few cuts here a few welds there...everyone I've looked at says to just upgraded parts on the motor or something lazy if your going to do something do it right...

So any ideas on what to do to the frame what would be a good motor to use, just any good insight would be helpful...also open to the don't ruin a classic suggestions.

Thanks in advance.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 12:16 PM
  #2  
cashs mom's Avatar
cashs mom
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 149
From: Texas
Default

Seriously?? If your daughter wants a hybrid, buy her a prius.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 12:38 PM
  #3  
TomKat's Avatar
TomKat
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 849
From: Ca
Default

yea i agree don't ruin the integrity of the mustang so you can get better mpg.... if you are set on great mpg you should do the for 4cyl turbo engine swap out of the fox body mustang someone on the forum did it and actually had a very nice ride.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 01:15 PM
  #4  
66hrdtcoupe's Avatar
66hrdtcoupe
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 21
From: Indiana
Default

That didn't take long for someone to get offended... The reason for better mpg and not just getting a prius is because the prius looks like **** and the mustang looks like well a mustang.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
guitarman376's Avatar
guitarman376
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 764
From: California
Default

I understand why you would want this, but don't do it. By the time you would be done you would have a car twice as expensive as buying a used prius that doesnt even get the same mpg. That is, if you could get it to work (I would doubt even the most experienced amateur gearhead could do this). If you are set on a mustang however, I agree a 4 cylinder turbo 65 or 66 would be cool, and like tomkat said someone on this forum has done it already so maybe they could be helpful.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 02:25 PM
  #6  
69thunder's Avatar
69thunder
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 248
From:
Default

Are you a multi millionaire? It can be done I'm sure but cost would be ridiculous and the potential savings would never be recovered.

Last edited by 69thunder; Dec 14, 2012 at 02:33 PM.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 03:36 PM
  #7  
66hrdtcoupe's Avatar
66hrdtcoupe
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 21
From: Indiana
Default

My intentions aren't for me to save money if that was the case i wouldn't be restoring Ann old mustang, just saying, i was simply thinking of combing the new with the old without destroying the integrity of the classic mustang. I thought it would be kinda cool to modify a classic in a sense without making it visibly different like big stupid rims tv screens in the floors and the top chopped. I guess maybe if i was murdering a Camaro on here it would be different.
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 06:16 PM
  #8  
Gun Jam's Avatar
Gun Jam
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,212
From: Hills of California
Default

someone here built a 66 electric only vehicle They were expecting to pay about 25k for the setup and 10k alone in batteries. It was suppose to run on 98 3.2v cells in a series parallel arrangement. The 3.2v per cell makes me thinks its a lithium Fe pack. The avg Toyota Pious uses either Nimh pack or a lithium based pack...both equally nasty. As far as I know this project never provided useable results.

My suggestion is to just build a nice mustang with a standard 289 engine. Used the money saved to build a nice engine that produces 260rwhp gets 18mpg and save the rest of the money for fuel....Then just tell everyone its a hybrid (burns gas and rubber) and make sure to park it all the time in the Fresh N' Sleazy "hybrid parking only" spots



-Gun
Old Dec 14, 2012 | 08:30 PM
  #9  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

As an alternative, the only semi-practical way to do this, assuming you have the technical know-how, is to use a modern hybrid transmission that has internal electrical-assist motors. Dodge and GM both have setups like this in their truck/suv hybrid platforms.
Old Dec 15, 2012 | 02:34 AM
  #10  
TomKat's Avatar
TomKat
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 849
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Gun Jam
someone here built a 66 electric only vehicle They were expecting to pay about 25k for the setup and 10k alone in batteries. It was suppose to run on 98 3.2v cells in a series parallel arrangement. The 3.2v per cell makes me thinks its a lithium Fe pack. The avg Toyota Pious uses either Nimh pack or a lithium based pack...both equally nasty. As far as I know this project never provided useable results.

My suggestion is to just build a nice mustang with a standard 289 engine. Used the money saved to build a nice engine that produces 260rwhp gets 18mpg and save the rest of the money for fuel....Then just tell everyone its a hybrid (burns gas and rubber) and make sure to park it all the time in the Fresh N' Sleazy "hybrid parking only" spots



-Gun
LOVE THIS!! Instagram worthy lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.