Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

427 stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2017 | 11:45 PM
  #1  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default 427 stroker

So I have a 347 in my 66. But, My 75 bronco is a little sluggish. So I was thinkin maybe getting a new long block for my bronco. However, since my mustang with the 347 just runs terrific, why not screw that up and take out that power plant and put it in my bronco. Then, put a 363 or 427 in my mustang!
Am I thinking clearly?
So how tight is a 351 block in a 66? I know I will need new headers, but it that all? for 2k difference I may as well have both of them be awesome right?
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 05:03 AM
  #2  
shelbymustangdan's Avatar
shelbymustangdan
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 225
From: PA
Default

I would go with the engine swap from the Mustang to the Bronco, with a new engine for the Mustang.

I may be wrong, but I believe the 363s are based on a 302 block and the 427s are based on the 351 block. The 363 shouldn't be an issue at all as far as room.

Good luck!
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 09:14 AM
  #3  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default

you are correct about the blocks. Is anyone on here running a 351 block in a 65 or 66
Old Nov 22, 2017 | 10:29 PM
  #4  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

I know FPA makes swap headers for that...
Old Nov 28, 2017 | 12:46 AM
  #5  
drewsky's Avatar
drewsky
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 887
From: Arizona
Default

I’d keep the 347 in the mustang and put the big block in the bronco. 65-68 mustangs run better with small blocks as far as handling and drive ability
Old Nov 28, 2017 | 08:29 AM
  #6  
racer_dave's Avatar
racer_dave
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 516
From: Michigan
Default

NoReins put a 351 based engine in her car, I remember she had some type of issue getting the right oil pan but I think that was due to the aftermarket crossmember and power rack making it a tight fit. Hers was a 67 though, so it might have been a bit wider between the towers, not sure.
Old Nov 29, 2017 | 12:49 AM
  #7  
drewsky's Avatar
drewsky
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 887
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by MonsterBilly
you are correct about the blocks. Is anyone on here running a 351 block in a 65 or 66
I️ had a 65 coupe about 10 years ago with a Windsor in it. Was very very tight, it came that way and sold it that way, but the 289-302 is a much better option. Also had a 67 coupe with a fully built 351w as well and it had more room for than the 65 but still not as good as a 289 based block. Id take a 331-347 stroker in a 65-68 Mustang all day over 351+ sized block
Old Nov 30, 2017 | 09:22 PM
  #8  
MonsterBilly's Avatar
MonsterBilly
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,676
From: Goodyear, AZ
Default

The handling and drivability should be the same. There is cery little difference in the 351 and 302 blocks. Just a slightly different deck hieght. The wieght is nearly the same. The difference is only about 50 lbs.
I dont think i can get mi h more power out of a 302 iron block and i want more juice in the 66.

I am so far leaning on a 351 based 427 in the 66.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.