Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

1967 engine help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #11  
Sinister Audio's Avatar
Sinister Audio
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 487
From:
Default RE: 1967 engine help

i would probaly make a 351W with 351C heads on it just for a cool combo. they can be done pretty cheaply too.
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
waxyourboard's Avatar
waxyourboard
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 614
From: Sarasota/Orlando, Florida
Default RE: 1967 engine help

390, 406, 410, 428, or anywhere in between there. Get some torque []
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #13  
Lee Willis's Avatar
Lee Willis
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 309
Default RE: 1967 engine help

I'd hate to see you change the motor in what sounds to be a pretty original car. You can make it FAST by putting in a big, really modded V8. But it will be and feel heavy in front, it will not be a really balanced car, and if you stick with a carburated version (most do) it will get poor fuel encomy and only so-so driveability. On the other hand, very little has as much class as a well turned out 68 Mustang that hasn't been screwed up with mods - a true classic.You can buy a lot of chrome parts to dress it up, and performance parts to boost output quite a bit while keeping that 289. It will be faster, but never FAST compared to the really quick street cars on this or similar forums.

If you are going to change the engine, while you can go with big block engines, a 302 or 331 stroked 302 would be a best choice. Its basically a derivative of the 289 and weighs about the same, fits right in, and feels, in every way, like its meant for your car (because it sort of is). I'd get a fuel injected/digital ignition one, for sure, which might mean changing fuel pumps (I'm not sure). Easiest and cleanest way would be to buy a fuel crate engine, with engine computer for the fulel injection and ignition, and then put it in with headers, etc. You'd double your HP, and you would additionally find plenty of chrome dress up parts for you engine available from numerous sources.

If you go with a bigger basic engine you have the potential for more HP but also to spend much more money and probably not make it as nice a daily driver.
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #14  
rgormansouth's Avatar
rgormansouth
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 42
From:
Default RE: 1967 engine help

Hey, I can tell you from exsperience the most efficient way to go would be storke the 289 out/347. Shop around educate yourself on what quality parts they are selling in there kits. Goin with larger displacement 351w/stroked out is fine. Really not much more for quality kit but when you go with windsor block/taller then 289/302 it is gonna give you less options for what you can use for header applications. Headers can be a bitch, what everyone will try to sell you and what will actually fit without gettin the hammer out. I got a stroked 351w/408 in a 67 fb , after a couple of months digging I finally settled on jba mid length headers for my car, exspensive $700 and chainge.When you pushed the subject with everyone no really guarentied installation with anything else.
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #15  
65fastback351's Avatar
65fastback351
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 30
Default RE: 1967 engine help

i think someone already said it...but 390 would be a great torque monster....and if you have an extra 15k laying around...just go with the 427 sohc dual carbed motor.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nick Oliver
V6 S197 General Discussion
6
Oct 17, 2018 04:22 AM
AmericanMuscle4.6GT
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
Nov 10, 2015 02:06 PM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
3
Sep 15, 2015 07:34 PM
TfcCDR
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
Sep 14, 2015 12:08 PM
Pyrate Dave
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
8
Sep 10, 2015 07:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.