260 V8
ORIGINAL: Elenor
WRONG! 289 and 302 share a common bore, and can be used interchangably, but there are minor differences. The 351W is totally different. Don't spread incorrect knowledge. It doesn't help anybody.
WRONG! 289 and 302 share a common bore, and can be used interchangably, but there are minor differences. The 351W is totally different. Don't spread incorrect knowledge. It doesn't help anybody.
You can all of a sudden type and spell dramatically better than you have been.
Interesting...
But unfortunately, you're now coming off more as a jerk rather than a 9 year old.
Maybe you should come up with a third online persona for when you want to actually contribute.
The displacement is changed by the bore and/or stroke. The 260 has a bore and stroke of 3.80x2.87. The 289 has a bore and stroke of 4.00x2.87. The 302 has a bore and stroke of 4.00x3.00. There is another engine in the family that was actually the first in the line. It is the 221 that was built in '62 & '63. It's bore and stroke is 3.500x2.87.
ORIGINAL: Shifty101Easy
so 260, 289, 302 are all the same? if they only had different heads how could that increase displacement?
I know for a fact the 351 is its own entity.
so 260, 289, 302 are all the same? if they only had different heads how could that increase displacement?
I know for a fact the 351 is its own entity.
ahhh yes ive heard of the 221 as well i believe.
so is this anything special or not really? i could drive up to santa rosa but dont want to spend 2000 on a car because of an undersized engine that "could" be something special...the tranny probably isnt anything too special either...ford 3spd is pretty standard back then i believe correct?
so is this anything special or not really? i could drive up to santa rosa but dont want to spend 2000 on a car because of an undersized engine that "could" be something special...the tranny probably isnt anything too special either...ford 3spd is pretty standard back then i believe correct?
yeah...just like the mustangs today. 
id personally pay more for a manual though....funny how things change eh?
i dont want to have to switch over to a manual tranny as it sounds costly and hard but i guess if its for a more quality car its worth it....
was the 4 speed manual upgrade a higher upgrade than an automatic or below it?

id personally pay more for a manual though....funny how things change eh?
i dont want to have to switch over to a manual tranny as it sounds costly and hard but i guess if its for a more quality car its worth it....
was the 4 speed manual upgrade a higher upgrade than an automatic or below it?


