Detailing Discuss detailing and the appearance of your ride inside and out here.

Magnaflow proof

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
Davidj's Avatar
Davidj
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 48
From:
Default Magnaflow proof

<P class=Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman">O.K. its seems to me that most everyone agrees that Flowmasters sound the best but Magnaflows produce more hp. My question is how much more, does anyone have a comparison. I’m willing to give up a few h.p. for the bad *** sound of the Flowmasters( I have 40 series). But if its more then that I will change.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o></FONT></FONT></P>
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #2  
piston's Avatar
piston
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 210
From: Alberta Canada
Default Magnaflow proof



Yeah, I'd like to see some numbers too. I'm doing my catback (is it still a catback if you don't have any cats?) in spring and was planning on using magnaflows. For me however the flowmasters are about2/3 the price, so its a cost/hp issue for me.</P>
Old Oct 29, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #3  
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
Dan04COBRA
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 14,917
Default Magnaflow proof



From comparisons I've done with supercharged 03 Cobra's...</P>


Magnaflow put out nearly 20 MORE HP than the Flowmaster system on 2 cars that had base dyno runs, and then replaced their exhaust (cat-back).</P>


If you search for it you might find my thread. I'm going to say on a NA car, you can see 5+ more hp from Magnaflow than you will with Flowmaster.</P>
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
Vrooom
4.6L General Discussion
13
Feb 21, 2016 05:25 PM
Spiral534
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
6
Oct 6, 2015 04:31 PM
Goldenpony
2005-2014 Mustangs
14
Aug 19, 2015 08:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.