General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.

Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #11  
Stepman's Avatar
Stepman
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,090
From: Az
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

ThatIS interesting..I am still carbed myself and found you can alo save gason the upshifts. I shift by 2k and skip 3rd. I noticed quite a difference doing it ths way but can't go too long keeping my foot out of it, loosing any gains.
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #12  
OnyxCobra's Avatar
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,467
From: Rochester, NY
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

I'm pretty sure it's better to leave the car in gear cause when you're engine braking the air/fuel mixture should be more lean than at idle. Either way putting the car in neutral and coasting and braking to a stop is incorrect, and is also using more brakes than necessary.
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #13  
strykrpixel's Avatar
strykrpixel
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 37
From:
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

ORIGINAL: blstoff

yes , by coasting I mean leaving it in gear . here is a little more about coasting fuel shutoff . there are certain criteria that have to be met before the ecm will enter coasting fuel shutoff . this is how its setup from ford ,

minimumvehicle speedto enter= 25mph
minimum rpm to enter= 950
time at closed throttle to enter = 4
rpm below to turn fuel on = 800
vehicle speedbelow to turn fuel on = 3
minimum coolant temp to enter = 160


there's a few more parameters but you can see whats happening w/ these . so , say your going 25mph+ . you have to be off the accelerator for 4 seconds & then the fuel injectors will shut off.when you press in the clutch pedal & the rpm's drop to 800 the injectorsare turning back on which is sooner than if you had just left it in gear . well , in your case I would say you are probably putting it in neutral before the injectors shut off .
Thanks blstoff for that detailed reply... that certainly answers my question and goes above and beyond. I appreciate the time it must've taken to find that data and it's very useful.

Impressed by MustangForums members as always!
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #14  
blstoff's Avatar
blstoff
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 492
From: MD
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

ORIGINAL: strykrpixel

ORIGINAL: blstoff

yes , by coasting I mean leaving it in gear . here is a little more about coasting fuel shutoff . there are certain criteria that have to be met before the ecm will enter coasting fuel shutoff . this is how its setup from ford ,

minimumvehicle speedto enter= 25mph
minimum rpm to enter= 950
time at closed throttle to enter = 4
rpm below to turn fuel on = 800
vehicle speedbelow to turn fuel on = 3
minimum coolant temp to enter = 160


there's a few more parameters but you can see whats happening w/ these . so , say your going 25mph+ . you have to be off the accelerator for 4 seconds & then the fuel injectors will shut off.when you press in the clutch pedal & the rpm's drop to 800 the injectorsare turning back on which is sooner than if you had just left it in gear . well , in your case I would say you are probably putting it in neutral before the injectors shut off .
Thanks blstoff for that detailed reply... that certainly answers my question and goes above and beyond. I appreciate the time it must've taken to find that data and it's very useful.

Impressed by MustangForums members as always!
glad to help . it only took a few clicks of the mouse to get that info for you . I do my own tuning so I have access toall that stuff. one other thing , I have an automatic & coasting fuel shutoff doesn'tturn onin 4th gear so I'm assuming its the same for a manual trans in 5th gear .
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #15  
.boB's Avatar
.boB
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 939
From:
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

Well, all that theory is pretty interesting. I learned some stuff. BUT, does it answer the question? IMO, no really. Theory is good, but without testing, it's just theory.

So, time to test the theory. Commute for one week using engine braking. See what your average gas mileage is. Then commute for one week coasting as much as possible. Which one saves more gas.

I don't know the answer. But I'm keen to find out.
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #16  
Jfsram's Avatar
Jfsram
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,999
From:
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

Both methods carry their own advantages and this only applies to cars new enough to carry the shut off feature.

I'll say how you apply each method will determine which is the best method.

If you engine brake, you are indeed slowing the car. This is not the most efficient way of driving. Coasting in neutral may be using more fuel but think of this, the car will coast longer/further distance.

This is similar to which is a better rear brake. Rear brakes have little to offer. Just like decellerating. One may improve your mileage 0.5%, the other 0.6%. Most of your mileage improvements will be made during acceleration and cruising speed.
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #17  
strykrpixel's Avatar
strykrpixel
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 37
From:
Default RE: Engine Braking Vs. Idle Coasting

I just went through a tank using the engine braking method, 23 mpg, my current record for highest gas mileage
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jpplaw
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
1
Mar 19, 2025 08:53 AM
msavoia23
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
12
Jul 7, 2018 12:08 PM
yurizx6r
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
49
Sep 7, 2015 06:40 PM
mtxplod
Speed Density/Carb/SSP section
8
Aug 29, 2015 01:43 AM
HIS S-197
4.0L V6 Technical Discussions
1
Aug 10, 2015 05:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.