fox vs. 95 and up
#13
RE: fox vs. 95 and up
Finally someone else that likes straight pipes, and damn do they scream at WOT. I don't have my liscence yet, I get it in August. Colorado makes you hold your liscence for a year [:@].
#14
RE: fox vs. 95 and up
ORIGINAL: 1991_5.0_Convertible
Hey guys, my buddy got a 2002 gt a while ago and is always bragging of how much faster his is than my 1991 5.0. Is his car really that much faster? He also claims that his car is lighter than the 5.0s and it's pushing 280 hp at the wheels, stock.
Hey guys, my buddy got a 2002 gt a while ago and is always bragging of how much faster his is than my 1991 5.0. Is his car really that much faster? He also claims that his car is lighter than the 5.0s and it's pushing 280 hp at the wheels, stock.
Oh Sure.
He'll most likely run around a 14.3ish and you in your vert high 14's.
#16
RE: fox vs. 95 and up
Are you kidding, I LOVE that you have straight pipes..the louder the better in my oppinion..thats why I went with the virtually totally free flow exhaust set up in my car..then I had to drop in the cam just to make the noise even more insane.. i'm also a huge fan of having a lot of gurgle in a muscle car..all the power to you man for going straight pipes!! way to be!! (if you can, would you mine posting sound clips?)
#18
RE: fox vs. 95 and up
ORIGINAL: 1991_5.0_Convertible
Were you being sarcatic with the 280 hp at the wheels or verifying it? Are those stock times that you gave me?
Were you being sarcatic with the 280 hp at the wheels or verifying it? Are those stock times that you gave me?
They're rated at 260 to the flywheel stock, dyno around 225ish to the wheels.
And as for the times, just my predictions
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
1
01-21-2016 01:30 PM